The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics
Abstract
Studies of organizational processes can yield observations in the form of event time series that can be analyzed to determine whether they reflect periodic, chaotic, white noise, or pink noise dynamic patterns. These different patterns each imply different underlying generative mechanisms and hence, different process theories. In this paper we present a model that describes how these four dynamical patterns are different from one another. Specifically, a causal system can be characterized by its dimensionality, and by the nature of interaction between causal factors. Low dimensional causal systems yield periodic and chaotic dynamics, while high dimensional causal systems yield white and pink noise dynamics. Periodic and white noise dynamics stem from systems where causal factors act independently, or in a linear fashion, while chaotic and pink noise systems stem from systems where causal factors act interdependently, in a nonlinear fashion. Thus, given a diagnosis of an observed event time series, we can hypothesize a particular story, or causal process theory, that might explain in organization-specific terms why such dynamics came about. In doing so, we also propose that the observation of chaotic organizational dynamics may often signify the presence of control and/or cooperation, rather than a lack of it, as implied by the vernacular use of the term. We conclude by challenging organizational researchers to define new models that capture such observed behavior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Bohm, D., & Kuhn, T. S. (1964) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217783 · Cited by 9,130
Institutions and organizations
(1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1848 · Cited by 8,003
Deming, W. E. (1982) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 7,297
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments
Tushman, M. L., & Anderson, P. (1986) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392832 · Cited by 6,112
Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors
Grassberger, P., & Procaccia, I. (1983) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(83)90298-1 · Cited by 5,650
Bak, P., Tang, C., & Wiesenfeld, K. (1988) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.38.364 · Cited by 4,713
Longitudinal Field Research on Change: Theory and Practice
Pettigrew, A. M. (1990) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1.3.267 · Cited by 4,221
(1989) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(89)90186-6 · Cited by 3,431
Cited by
Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science
Anderson, P. (1999) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.10.3.216 · Cited by 2,118
Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence
Choi, T. Y., Dooley, K. J., & Rungtusanatham, M. (2001) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/s0272-6963(00)00068-1 · Cited by 1,607
Self-citationThe Politics of International Regime Complexity
Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592709090033 · Cited by 1,012
Organizations as complex adaptive systems: Implications of Complexity Theory for leadership research
Schneider, M., & Somers, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.006 · Cited by 599
Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20721419 · Cited by 517
Metadata
- Authors
- Dooley, K. J., & Van de Ven, A. H.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 358-372
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2139275397
- Cited by
- 403
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.10.3.358
- The paper
- Dooley, K. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (1999). Explaining Complex Organizational Dynamics. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.3.358
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.