The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection
Abstract
In this study, we address the topic of interorganizational network change by exploring factors that affect the choice of alliance and interlock partners. While many studies have been devoted to investigating various factors driving network partner choice, there is also an interesting and unexplored tension in this body of work. On the one hand, much work emphasizes change in social structure—showing that firms expand networks by forming new relationships with new partners. At the same time, other scholars emphasize stability of social structure—showing that firms tend to choose past exchange partners. We seek to reconcile this tension by proposing that firms form new relationships with new partners as a form of exploration, and form additional relationships with existing partners as a form of exploitation (March 1991). Further, whether exploration or exploitation is chosen depends on the type of uncertainty that firms are facing: whether it is firm-specific or market-level uncertainty. We test our hypotheses using data on both interlock and alliance networks for the 300 largest U.S. firms during the 1988–1993 period. The results provide some evidence that whether networks are stable or changing depends on the type of uncertainty experienced by firms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
March, J. G. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.71 · Cited by 21,942
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Hsiao, C. (2014) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139839327 · Cited by 7,869
The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits
Hansen, M. T. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667032 · Cited by 5,809
Cited by
The Interplay Between Exploration and Exploitation
Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083026 · Cited by 3,226
Exploration and Exploitation Within and Across Organizations
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M. L. (2010) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.1080/19416521003691287 · Cited by 1,650
Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in Alliance Formation
Lavie, D., & Rosenkopf, L. (2006) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2006.22083085 · Cited by 1,371
Renewing Research on Problemistic Search—A Review and Research Agenda
Posen, H. E., Keil, T., Kim, S., & Meissner, F. D. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0018 · Cited by 462
Clearing a Path Through the Forest: A Meta-Review of Interorganizational Relationships
Parmigiani, A., & Rivera-Santos, M. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311407507 · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-275
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2116650986
- Cited by
- 1,003
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 56.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1040.0065
- The paper
- Beckman, C. M., Haunschild, P. R., & Phillips, D. J. (2004). Friends or Strangers? Firm-Specific Uncertainty, Market Uncertainty, and Network Partner Selection. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.