The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Creativity Through “Mindless” Work: A Framework of Workday Design
Open accessAbstract
We propose that organizations use a new framework of workday design to enhance the creativity of today’s chronically overworked professionals. Although insights from creativity research have been integrated into models of work design to increase the stimulants of creativity (e.g., intrinsic motivation), this has not led to work design models that have effectively reduced the obstacles to creativity (e.g., workload pressures). As a consequence, creative output among professionals in high-workload contexts remains disappointing. In response, we offer a framework of work design that focuses on the design of entire workdays rather than the typical focus on designing either specific tasks or very broad job descriptions (e.g., as the job characteristics model in Hackman et al. 1975). Furthermore, we introduce the concept of “mindless” work (i.e., work that is low in both cognitive difficulty and performance pressures) as an integral part of this framework. We suggest that to enhance creativity among chronically overworked professionals, workdays should be designed to alternate between bouts of cognitively challenging and high-pressure work (as suggested in the original model by Hackman et al. 1975), and bouts of mindless work (as defined in this paper). We discuss the implications of our framework for theories of work design and creativity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Fredrickson, B. L. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.218 · Cited by 18,025
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF PERSONAL ENGAGEMENT AND DISENGAGEMENT AT WORK.
Kahn, W. A. (1990) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256287 · Cited by 10,975
Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122 · Cited by 2,986
Duncker, K. (1945) · Psychological Monographs · doi:10.1037/h0093599 · Cited by 2,938
Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0 · Cited by 2,206
Dunkley, D. M., Zuroff, D. C., & Blankstein, K. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.234 · Cited by 662
Cited by
George, J. M. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559814 · Cited by 781
Byron, K., Khazanchi, S., & Nazarian, D. (2010) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017868 · Cited by 491
It's the Little Things That Matter: An Examination of Knowledge Workers' Energy Management
Fritz, C., Lam, C. F., & Spreitzer, G. M. (2011) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.25.3.zol28 · Cited by 293
Mumford, M. D., Hester, K. S., & Robledo, I. C. (2012) · Handbook of Organizational Creativity · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374714-3.00001-x · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2006-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470-483
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2096652935
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 17.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Creativity Through “Mindless” Work: A Framework of Workday Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1060.0193
- The paper
- Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing Creativity Through “Mindless” Work: A Framework of Workday Design. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0193
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.