The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Setting Your Own Standards: Internal Corporate Governance Codes as a Response to Institutional Pressure
Abstract
This paper is concerned with organizational response to institutional pressure. We argue that when faced with externally imposed standards, organizations can sometimes respond by developing alternative standards for the same practices. This “substitution response” can shift the attention of stakeholders away from noncompliance with the original standards to adherence to the alternative standards. Empirically, we examine organizational response to the introduction of a government-sponsored but nonmandatory corporate governance code. Unable to comply with all of the requirements of this very specific and demanding code, many firms responded by developing their own internal corporate governance codes. We predict and show that adoption of these internal codes is driven by the visibility of a firm's corporate governance practices and by mimetic forces. We also find that internal governance codes differ in their degree of ceremoniality and that ceremoniality is inversely related to organizational dependence on stakeholders who value good corporate governance. These findings help us to understand when organizational responses to institutional pressure take a ceremonial as opposed to substantive form.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism
Guriev, S., & Rachinsky, A. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330053147994 · Cited by 453
Managerial values and corporate codes of ethics
Cressey, D. R., & Moore, C. A. (1983) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165032 · Cited by 316
Sine, W. D., David, R. J., & Mitsuhashi, H. (2007) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0300 · Cited by 241
Self-citation
Cited by
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting in China: Symbol or Substance?
Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0837 · Cited by 1,793
Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure: A Global Study of Greenwashing
Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2015.1039 · Cited by 1,680
Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets
Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2015.1014661 · Cited by 580
The Role of Oligarchs in Russian Capitalism
Guriev, S., & Rachinsky, A. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/0895330053147994 · Cited by 453
Wijen, F. (2014) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2012.0218 · Cited by 459
Metadata
- Authors
- Okhmatovskiy, I., & David, R. J.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2012-02
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 155-176
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2148136671
- Cited by
- 179
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Setting Your Own Standards: Internal Corporate Governance Codes as a Response to Institutional Pressure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.1100.0642
- The paper
- Okhmatovskiy, I., & David, R. J. (2012). Setting Your Own Standards: Internal Corporate Governance Codes as a Response to Institutional Pressure. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.