The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defining Who You Are By What You're Not: Organizational Disidentification and The National Rifle Association
Open accessAbstract
Through two exploratory studies, we develop and test an introductory framework of “organizational disidentification.” Our first study explores the concept of organizational disidentification through a qualitative investigation of cognitive relationships with the National Rifle Association (NRA). Findings suggest that organizational disidentification is a self-perception based on: (1) a cognitive separation between one's identity and the organization's identity, and (2) a negative relational categorization of oneself and the organization (e.g., categorizations such as “rivals” or “enemies”). Organizational disidentification appears to be motivated by individuals' desires to both affirm positive distinctiveness and avoid negative distinctiveness by distancing themselves from incongruent values and negative stereotypes attributed to an organization. Our findings also suggest that organizational disidentification can lead individuals to take action (either volunteer work or voicing their opinion) as a result of their perceived separation from the organization's identity. Results of our second study”a large-scale survey of public attitudes about the NRA”provide support for this framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151312 · Cited by 109,314
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans.
Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797 · Cited by 9,020
The Social Self: On Being the Same and Different at the Same Time
Brewer, M. B. (1991) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167291175001 · Cited by 5,107
The Psychology of Self-Affirmation: Sustaining the Integrity of the Self
Steele, C. M. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60229-4 · Cited by 3,697
Who is this "We"? Levels of collective identity and self representations.
Brewer, M. B., & Gardner, W. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.83 · Cited by 3,401 · cited 1×
“…identity), although most participants discussed the importance of clear separation vs. a large or small separation of identities.2 Second, this definition suggests that disidentification is a form of “relational” categorization (Brewer and Gardner 1996) defining the organization and the individual.”
BackgroundTheory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes
Wood, J. V. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.231 · Cited by 1,957
Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291393 · Cited by 1,481
Cited by
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.2.76.18609 · Cited by 3,336
Self-citationCorporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework
Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070303258971 · Cited by 1,873
Group Faultlines: A Review, Integration, and Guide to Future Research
Thatcher, S. M. B., & Patel, P. C. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311426187 · Cited by 391
Lehman, D. W., O’Connor, K., Kovács, B., & Newman, G. E. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2017.0047 · Cited by 317
Investigating the effects of smart technology on customer dynamics and customer experience
Foroudi, P., Gupta, S., Sivarajah, U., & Broderick, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.014 · Cited by 286
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsbach, K. D., & Bhattacharya, C. B.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 393-413
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2109900598
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defining Who You Are By What You're Not: Organizational Disidentification and The National Rifle Association. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638
- The paper
- Elsbach, K. D., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Defining Who You Are By What You're Not: Organizational Disidentification and The National Rifle Association. Organization Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.393.10638
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
