The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Organizing Vision in Information Systems Innovation
Abstract
We offer a revised institutional view of how new technology for information systems (IS) comes to be applied and diffused among organizations. Previous research argues that early adoption of a technological innovation is based on local, rational organizational choice, while later adoption is institutionalized and taken for granted. We suggest that institutional processes are engaged from the beginning. Specifically, a diverse interorganizational community creates and employs an organizing vision of an IS innovation that is central to its early, as well as later, diffusion. This vision serves key functions in interpretation, legitimation, and the organization and mobilization of economic roles and exchanges. The development and influence of an organizing vision is determined by a variety of institutional forces. Among these forces, the community's discourse serves as the developmental engine. Other factors—business commerce, the IS practitioners' world view, the motivating business problematic, the core technology, and material processes of adoption and diffusion—provide the discourse with its content, structure, motivation, and direction. Primary development of the organizing vision takes place during the innovation's earliest diffusion. The hesitant early majority among the prospective adopters relies on this development in its efforts to make sense of the innovation. Where the organizing vision remains underdeveloped after early adoption, later diffusion and institutionalization of the innovation is likely to be retarded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing
Attewell, P. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.1.1 · Cited by 1,401
Cited by
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2015.08.002 · Cited by 1,317
Kim, D. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305281619 · Cited by 342
From Artefacts to Infrastructures
Monteiro, E., Pollock, N., Hanseth, O., & Williams, R. (2013) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1 · Cited by 258
The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: discourse analysis
Greenhalgh, T., Procter, R., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., & Shaw, S. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574 · Cited by 199
The communal resource and information systems
von Krogh, G. (2002) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/s0963-8687(02)00006-9 · Cited by 163
Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice1
Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650319 · Cited by 137
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. H. (2022) · Computing Handbook · doi:10.1201/9780429171529-98 · Cited by 103
Sociotechnical Approaches to the Study of Information Systems
Sawyer, S., & Jarrahi, M. (2014) · Computing Handbook, Third Edition · doi:10.1201/b16768-7 · Cited by 103
A framework for addressing the organisational issues of enterprise systems implementation
Ward, J., Hemingway, C., & Daniel, E. (2005) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2005.04.005 · Cited by 100
Ravindran, K., Susarla, A., Mani, D., & Gurbaxani, V. (2015) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2015.0572 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- Swanson, E. B., & Ramiller, N. C.
- Venue
- Organization Science
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 458-474
- ISSN
- 1047-7039 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-5455
- OpenAlex
- W2011982854
- Cited by
- 782
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.