Cited by 137Information Systems Theories and ImplementationManagement and Organizational StudiesInnovation Diffusion and Forecasting

Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice1

Baskerville, Richard L., Myers, Michael D.·2009·MIS Quarterly

Abstract

Building on neo-institutional theory and theories of innovation and diffusion, recent work in the field of management has suggested that management research and practice is characterized by fashions. A management fashion is a relatively transitory belief that a certain management technique leads rational management progress. Using bibliographic research, we apply Abrahamson’s management fashion theory to information systems research and practice. Our findings reveal that information systems research and practice, like management research and practice, is indeed characterized by fashions. These “IS fashion waves” are relatively transitory and represent a burst of interest in particular topics by IS researchers and practitioners. However, while our findings show that IS research closely parallels practice, we suggest that a more proactive engagement of IS academics is needed in the IS fashion-setting process.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/20650319

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Academia, policy and general discussions follow the technology hype cycle, and attention to technologies, management models and research approaches have characteristics of fashion cycles.

    “This is not to deny its importance but a recognition that academia, like policy and general discussions follow the technology hype cycle [52] and attention to technologies, management models and research approaches have characteristics of fashion cycles [1,12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • Department of Information Systems and, Operations Management, University of Auckland Business School, Auckland, New Zealand 1142
Venue
MIS Quarterly
Publisher
MIS Quarterly
Published
2009-12-01
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
647-662
ISSN
  • 0276-7783 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-9730
OpenAlex
W3178018057
Cited by
137
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 14
FWCI
39.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • MIS Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting
Keywords
management fashions, information systems research, information systems practice, new institutionalism, diffusion of innovations, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review