The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models.
Open accessAbstract
In humans, cancer may be caused by genetics and environmental exposures; however, in the majority of instances the identification of the critical time window of exposure is problematic. The evidence for exposures occurring during the preconceptional period that have an association with childhood or adulthood cancers is equivocal. Agents definitely related to cancer in children, and adulthood if exposure occurs in utero, include: maternal exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy and childhood leukemia and certain other cancers, and maternal use of diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy and clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina of their daughters. The list of environmental exposures that occur during the perinatal/postnatal period with potential to increase the risk of cancer is lengthening, but evidence available to date is inconsistent and inconclusive. In animal models, preconceptional carcinogenesis has been demonstrated for a variety of types of radiation and chemicals, with demonstrated sensitivity for all stages from fetal gonocytes to postmeiotic germ cells. Transplacental and neonatal carcinogenesis show marked ontogenetic stage specificity in some cases. Mechanistic factors include the number of cells at risk, the rate of cell division, the development of differentiated characteristics including the ability to activate and detoxify carcinogens, the presence of stem cells, and possibly others. Usefulness for human risk estimation would be strengthened by the study of these factors in more than one species, and by a focus on specific human risk issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prenatal Airborne Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Exposure and Child IQ at Age 5 Years
Perera, F. P., Li, Z., Whyatt, R., Hoepner, L., Wang, S., Camann, D., & Rauh, V. (2009) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3506 · Cited by 420
Singh, V. K., Patel, D. K., Jyoti, Ram, S., Mathur, N., & Siddiqui, M. K. J. (2008) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2007.11.017 · Cited by 94
Cosmetics as endocrine disruptors: are they a health risk?
Nicolopoulou-Stamati, P., Hens, L., & Sasco, A. J. (2015) · Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s11154-016-9329-4 · Cited by 78
Schüz, J. (2003) · Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3016.2003.00460.x · Cited by 29
Yuan, H., Kehm, R. D., Daaboul, J. M., Lloyd, S. E., McDonald, J. A., Mu, L., Tehranifar, P., Zhang, K., Terry, M. B., & Yang, W. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56634-w · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, L. M., Diwan, B. A., Fear, N. T., & Roman, E.
- Venue
- Environmental Health Perspectives
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- suppl 3
- Pages
- 573-594
- ISSN
- 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-9924
- OpenAlex
- W2031052102
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1289/ehp.00108s3573
- The paper
- Anderson, L. M., Diwan, B. A., Fear, N. T., & Roman, E. (2000). Critical windows of exposure for children's health: cancer in human epidemiological studies and neoplasms in experimental animal models. Environmental Health Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108s3573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.