Cited by 46Air Quality and Health ImpactsClimate Change and Health ImpactsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Time-series analyses of air pollution and mortality in the United States: a subsampling approach

Open access
Moolgavkar, Suresh H., McClellan, Roger O., Dewanji, Anup, Turim, Jay, Luebeck, E. Georg, Edwards, Melanie·2013·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hierarchical Bayesian methods have been used in previous papers to estimate national mean effects of air pollutants on daily deaths in time-series analyses. OBJECTIVES: We obtained maximum likelihood estimates of the common national effects of the criteria pollutants on mortality based on time-series data from ≤ 108 metropolitan areas in the United States. METHODS: We used a subsampling bootstrap procedure to obtain the maximum likelihood estimates and confidence bounds for common national effects of the criteria pollutants, as measured by the percentage increase in daily mortality associated with a unit increase in daily 24-hr mean pollutant concentration on the previous day, while controlling for weather and temporal trends. We considered five pollutants [PM10, ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and sulfur dioxide (SO2)] in single- and multipollutant analyses. Flexible ambient concentration-response models for the pollutant effects were considered as well. We performed limited sensitivity analyses with different degrees of freedom for time trends. RESULTS: In single-pollutant models, we observed significant associations of daily deaths with all pollutants. The O3 coefficient was highly sensitive to the degree of smoothing of time trends. Among the gases, SO2 and NO2 were most strongly associated with mortality. The flexible ambient concentration-response curve for O3 showed evidence of nonlinearity and a threshold at about 30 ppb. CONCLUSIONS: Differences between the results of our analyses and those reported from using the Bayesian approach suggest that estimates of the quantitative impact of pollutants depend on the choice of statistical approach, although results are not directly comparable because they are based on different data. In addition, the estimate of the O3-mortality coefficient depends on the amount of smoothing of time trends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.1104507

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies found evidence of a threshold effect around 30 ppb (approximately 60 μg/m3) using the 24-hour average metric in the U.S., 30-40 ppb (approximately 60-80 μg/m3) in Korea and Japan, and 65 μg/m3 using the MDA8 metric in London, U.K.

    “On the contrary, recent studies found evidence of a threshold effect around 30 ppb (approximately 60 μg/m3) using the 24-hour average metric in U.S. (Moolgavkar et al., 2013; Stylianou and Nicolich, 2009), 30–40 ppb (approximately 60–80 μg/m3) using the 24-hour average metric in Korea and Japan (Bae et al., 2015), and 65 μg/m3 using the MDA8 metric in London, U.K. (Atkinson et al., 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 21 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Politis DN, Romano JP, Wolf M 1999 Subsampling NewYork Springer

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moolgavkar, S. H., McClellan, R. O., Dewanji, A., Turim, J., Luebeck, E. G., & Edwards, M.
Affiliations
  • Exponent (United States) (US)
  • Toxicology and Human Health Risk Analysis, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
  • Indian Statistical Institute (IN)
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Moolgavkar, Suresh H.
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2012-10-24
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
73-78
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W1754526007
Cited by
46
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
air pollution, mortality, criteria pollutants, ozone, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, carbon monoxide, PM10, concentration-dependent effects, threshold, daily deaths
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, United States, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review