Cited by 450Air Quality and Health ImpactsClimate Change and Health ImpactsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Seasonal analyses of air pollution and mortality in 100 US cities

Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Zeger, S. L., Samet, J. M.·2005·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Time series models relating short-term changes in air pollution levels to daily mortality counts typically assume that the effects of air pollution on the log relative rate of mortality do not vary with time. However, these short-term effects might plausibly vary by season. Changes in the sources of air pollution and meteorology can result in changes in characteristics of the air pollution mixture across seasons. The authors developed Bayesian semiparametric hierarchical models for estimating time-varying effects of pollution on mortality in multisite time series studies. The methods were applied to the database of the National Morbidity and Mortality Air Pollution Study, which includes data for 100 US cities, for the period 1987-2000. At the national level, a 10-microg/m(3) increase in particulate matter less than 10 microm in aerodynamic diameter at a 1-day lag was associated with 0.15% (95% posterior interval (PI): -0.08, 0.39), 0.14% (95% PI: -0.14, 0.42), 0.36% (95% PI: 0.11, 0.61), and 0.14% (95% PI: -0.06, 0.34) increases in mortality for winter, spring, summer, and fall, respectively. An analysis by geographic region found a strong seasonal pattern in the Northeast (with a peak in summer) and little seasonal variation in the southern regions of the country. These results provide useful information for understanding particle toxicity and guiding future analyses of particle constituent data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/aje/kwi075

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • National average estimates are robust to model specification for weather and seasonal confounding.

    “Sensitivity analyses and characteristics of the first-stage statistical model for confounding adjustment have been explored for particulate matter (PM), with results indicating that national average estimates are robust to model specification for weather and seasonal confounding (Peng et al. 2005; Welty and Zeger 2005).”

    From The Exposure–Response Curve for Ozone and Risk of Mortality and the Adequacy of Current Ozone Regulations (2006) · cites this paper as Peng et al. 2005

    The Sensitivity analyses section (page unavailable) reports that added temperature terms did not noticeably change the overall seasonal PM10 pattern, and estimates appeared stable with stronger control for seasonality and long-term trends. But it also reports considerable deviations with only 3 degrees of freedom per year, so the unqualified claim of robustness across model specifications overstates the findings. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A lag of 1 day for PM variables provided the most significant and largest effect in previous studies.

    “A lag of 1 day was used for PM variables because this lag structure provided the most significant and largest effect in previous studies (Peng et al. 2005).”
  • Effect estimates for PM2.5 and hospital admissions show temporal and spatial patterns, with the largest effects in the Northeast in summer.

    “Effect estimates for PM2.5 and hospital admissions show temporal and spatial patterns (Domenici et al. 2006), with the largest effects in the Northeast in summer (Peng et al. 2005), which could be the result of differential toxicity of particles.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Environmental Protection Agency. Air quality criteria for particulate matter (fourth external review draft). (EPA publication nos. EPA/600/P-99/ 002aD and EPA/600/P-99/002bD). Research Triangle Park, NC: National Center for Environmental Assessment, 2003.
  2. Spengler J, Wilson R. Emissions, dispersion, and concentra- tion of particles. In: Wilson R, Spengler J, eds. Particles in our air. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996:41-62.
  3. Dominici F, McDermott A, Zeger SL, et al. Mortality among residents of 90 cities: revised analyses of time-series studies of air pollution and health. Cambridge, MA: Health Effects Institute, 2003:9-24.
  4. Samet JM, Zeger SL, Dominici F, et al. The National Morbidity, Mortality, and Air Pollution Study, part I: methods and methodological issues. Cambridge, MA: Health Effects Institute, 2000.
  5. Peng RD, Welty LJ. The NMMAPS data package. R News 2004;4:10-14. (World Wide Web URL: http://CRAN.R- project.org/doc/Rnews/).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, R. D., Dominici, F., Pastor-Barriuso, R., Zeger, S. L., & Samet, J. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Peng, R. D.
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2005-03-03
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
585-594
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W2097183694
Cited by
450
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
FWCI
14.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Effects Institute
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL 07024, T32HL007024)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P30 ES03819, R01ES012054, P30ES003819)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
air pollution, mortality, seasonal variation, particulate matter, PM10, time-dependent effects, particle toxicity, regional variation
MeSH terms
Air Pollution, Bayes Theorem, Humans, Mortality, Seasons, United States, Urban Population, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review