Cited by 297Sperm and Testicular FunctionMale Reproductive Health StudiesReproductive Health and Technologies

Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.

Open access
Swan, Shanna H, Brazil, Charlene, Drobnis, Erma Z, Liu, Fan, Kruse, Robin L, Hatch, Maureen, Redmon, J Bruce, Wang, Christina +2 more·2003·Environmental Health Perspectives

Abstract

Although geographic variation in semen quality has been reported, this is the first study in the United States to compare semen quality among study centers using standardized methods and strict quality control. We evaluated semen specimens from partners of 512 pregnant women recruited through prenatal clinics in four U.S. cities during 1999-2001; 91% of men provided two specimens. Sperm concentration, semen volume, and motility were determined at the centers, and morphology was assessed at a central laboratory. Study protocols were identical across centers, and quality control was rigorously maintained. Sperm concentration was significantly lower in Columbia, Missouri, than in New York, New York; Minneapolis, Minnesota; and Los Angeles, California. Mean counts were 58.7, 102.9, 98.6, and 80.8 X 10(6)/mL (medians 53.5, 88.5, 81.8, and 64.8 X 10(6)/mL) in Missouri, New York, Minnesota, and California, respectively. The total number of motile sperm was also lower in Missouri than in other centers: 113, 196, 201, and 162 X 10(6) in Missouri, New York, Minnesota, and California, respectively. Semen volume and the percent morphologically normal sperm did not differ appreciably among centers. These between-center differences remained significant in multivariate models that controlled for abstinence time, semen analysis time, age, race, smoking, history of sexually transmitted disease, and recent fever (all p-values < 0.01). Confounding factors and differences in study methods are unlikely to account for the lower semen quality seen in this mid-Missouri population. These data suggest that sperm concentration and motility may be reduced in semirural and agricultural areas relative to more urban and less agriculturally exposed areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1289/ehp.5927

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Swan et al. found no difference in PNS among 4 US cities despite a difference in concentration and motility.

    “This finding echoes the results of Swan et al. (15) who found no difference in the PNS among 4 US cities despite a difference in concentration and motility.”
  • Outcomes are inconsistent for studies correlating lifestyle and environmental exposures with sperm morphology.

    “Likewise, outcomes are inconsistent for studies correlating lifestyle and environmental exposures with sperm morphology (11, 12, 13, 14, 15).”

    From Poor reproducibility of percentage of normally shaped sperm using the World Health Organization Fifth Edition strict grading criteria (2022) · cites this paper as [15]

    The Discussion (p. 418) reports small, nonsignificant geographic differences in sperm morphology. The paper mentions smoking as a covariate and says pesticide-exposure analyses are planned, but our copy does not assess whether studies linking lifestyle or environmental exposures to sperm morphology have inconsistent outcomes (searched: inconsistent findings, smoking, pesticides, morphology). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Swan, S. H., Brazil, C., Drobnis, E. Z., Liu, F., Kruse, R. L., Hatch, M., Redmon, J. B., Wang, C., Overstreet, J. W., & Study For Future Families Research Group
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Environmental Health Perspectives
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
111
Issue
4
Pages
414-420
ISSN
  • 0091-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-9924
OpenAlex
W1988200713
Cited by
297
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MOspace Institutional Repository (University of Missouri) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Missouri (R01-ES09916)
  • University of Minnesota (MO1-RR00400)
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health (MO1‐RR00400, RR00400)
  • U.S. Public Health Service (M01-440425)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES09916, R01ES009916)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000400, MO 1 RR00400, M01-RR00400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
semen quality, sperm concentration, sperm motility, regional variation, agricultural exposure, urban-rural differences, male fertility
MeSH terms
Adult, Agriculture, Environmental Exposure, Geography, Humans, Infertility, Male, Male, Rural Population, Semen, Sperm Count, Sperm Motility, United States, Urban Population, Epidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review