Cited by 691Relativity and Gravitational TheoryGNSS positioning and interferenceAdvanced Frequency and Time Standards

Relativity in the Global Positioning System

Open access
Ashby, Neil·2003·Living Reviews in Relativity

Abstract

The Global Positioning System (GPS) uses accurate, stable atomic clocks in satellites and on the ground to provide world-wide position and time determination. These clocks have gravitational and motional frequency shifts which are so large that, without carefully accounting for numerous relativistic effects, the system would not work. This paper discusses the conceptual basis, founded on special and general relativity, for navigation using GPS. Relativistic principles and effects which must be considered include the constancy of the speed of light, the equivalence principle, the Sagnac effect, time dilation, gravitational frequency shifts, and relativity of synchronization. Experimental tests of relativity obtained with a GPS receiver aboard the TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite will be discussed. Recently frequency jumps arising from satellite orbit adjustments have been identified as relativistic effects. These will be explained and some interesting applications of GPS will be discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12942/lrr-2003-1

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Coordinate time synchronization can only be theoretically realized in approximation schemes, e.g. post-Newtonian approximation.

    “Indeed, coordinate time synchronization can only be theoretically realized in approximation schemes, e.g. postNewtonian approximation as reviewed in [26] for GPS.”

    From Chronometric Geodesy: Methods and Applications (2019) · cites this paper as [26]

    In “The Realization of Coordinate Time” (page unavailable), Ashby uses an approximate solution of the field equations as the basis for GPS coordinate-time synchronization. The paper does not establish that synchronization can *only* be theoretically realized through approximation schemes, and the cited passages do not identify the scheme as post-Newtonian. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]“IAU Resolutions adopted at the 24th General Assembly (Manchester, August 2000)”, project homepage, L’Observatoire de Paris: Le Bureau National de Métrologie — Systèmes de Référence Temps Espace (BNM — SYRTE), (2000). URL (cited on 20 December 2002): http://syrte.obspm.fr/IAU_resolutions/Resol-UAI.htm. 3
  2. [3]Department of Defense World Geodetic System 1984 — Its Definition and Relationships with Local Geodetic Systems, NIMA Technical Report, TR8350.2, (National Imagery and Mapping Agency, Bethesda, MD, 2004), 3rd corr. edition. Related online version (cited on 11 June 2007): http://earth-info.nga.mil/GandG/publications/tr8350.2/tr8350_2.html. 2
  3. [4]Allan DW Weiss M Ashby N Around-the-World Relativistic Sagnac Experiment Science 1985 228 69 70 10.1126/science.228.4695.69 17811569 · DOI
  4. [5]Alley C Meystre P Scully MO Proper time experiments in gravitational fields with atomic clocks, aircraft, and laser light pulses Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and Measurement Theory 1983 New York Plenum Press 363 427
  5. [7]Ashby N Allan DW Practical Implications of Relativity for a Global Coordinate Time Scale Radio Sci. 1979 14 649 669 10.1029/RS014i004p00649 · DOI
  6. [8]Ashby N Bertotti B Relativistic Effects in Local Inertial Frames Phys. Rev. D 1986 34 2246 2258 10.1103/PhysRevD.34.2246 9957411 · DOI
  7. [9]Ashby N Spilker JJ Jr Parkinson BW Spilker JJ Jr Introduction to Relativistic Effects on the Global Positioning System Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Vol. 1 1996 Washington, DC American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 623 697
  8. [13]Fitzpatrick P The Principles of Celestial Mechanics 1970 New York Academic Press
  9. [15]Garland GD The Earth’s Shape and Gravity 1965 New York Pergamon Press
  10. [16]Hulse RA Taylor JH Discovery of a pulsar in a binary system Astrophys. J. 1975 195 L51 L53 10.1086/181708 · DOI
  11. [17]Kraus JD Antennas 1988 2nd edition New York McGraw-Hill
  12. [18]Lambeck K i Geophysical Geodesy: The Slow Deformations of the Earth 1988 Oxford Clarendon Press 13 18
  13. [19]Malys S Slater J Maintenance and Enhancement of the World Geodetic System 1984 Proceedings of the 7th International Technical Meeting of The Satellite Division of The Institute of Navigation (ION GPS-94) 1994 Fairfax, VA Institute of Navigation 17 24
  14. [20]Mashhoon B Nonlocal Theory of Accelerated Observers Phys. Rev. A 1993 47 4498 4501 10.1103/PhysRevA.47.4498 9909459 · DOI
  15. [21]Mashhoon B On the Coupling of Intrinsic Spin with the Rotation of the Earth Phys. Lett. A 1995 198 9 13 10.1016/0375-9601(95)00010-Z · DOI
  16. [22]Parkinson BW Spilker JJ Jr Parkinson BW Spilker JJ Jr Overview of GPS Operation and Design Global Positioning System: Theory and Applications, Vol. 1 1996 Washington, DC American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics 29 56
  17. [23]Taylor JH Binary Pulsars and Relativistic Gravity Rev. Mod. Phys. 1994 66 711 719 10.1103/RevModPhys.66.711 · DOI
  18. [24]Tetewsky AK Mullen FE Effects of Platform Rotation on GPS with Implications for GPS Simulators Proceedings of the 9th International Technical Meeting of the Satellite Division of the Institute of Navigation (ION GPS-96) 1996 Fairfax, VA Institute of Navigation 1917 1925

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashby, N.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Ashby, Neil
Venue
Living Reviews in Relativity
Published
2003-01-28
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 1433-8351 (ISSN-L)
  • 2367-3613
OpenAlex
W2069459553
Cited by
691
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 72 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 30
FWCI
6.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Living Reviews in Relativity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Frequency and Time Standards
Keywords
global positioning system, relativity, atomic clocks, gravitational frequency shift, time dilation, Sagnac effect, equivalence principle, speed of light, TOPEX/Poseidon, frequency jumps, GPS navigation, tests of relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review