Cited by 17Occupational Therapy Practice and ResearchArt Therapy and Mental HealthPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Occupational therapy interventions in mental health: a scoping review of recent evidence

Petersen, Kirsten Schultz, Bjørkedal, Siv Therese Bogevik, Torsting, Anne Marie, Eplov, Lene Falgaard·2019·International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Background/Aims: Studies investigating the effect of occupational therapy in mental health are few. This scoping review aims to identify, present and assess studies that have investigated the effect of occupation- and activity-based/focused interventions performed by occupational therapists in mental health. Methods: The scoping review involved searching six databases, covering articles from 2003 to 2018. ‘The Matrix Method’ was used to describe and synthesise the content of the included studies. The Oxford Level of Evidence was used to rank the evidence, and The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme was used to assess the quality of the study. Results: A total of 21 original studies and 4 systematic reviews were included in this review. Interventions, approaches, programmes, training, and activities such as cooking, artwork, crafts, pottery, sports, calligraphy, horticulture, and music, organised individually or in groups, were investigated in the included studies. Individualised occupational therapy showed clinically significant improvements in social functioning and cognition, promising results were found on supported employment and education. Conclusions: Few high-quality studies that have investigated the effect of occupation-and activity-based/focused interventions performed by occupational therapists in mental health were found. This scoping review highlights the importance of future high quality studies to support evidence-based practice within mental health occupational therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12968/ijtr.2016.0070

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, K. S., Bjørkedal, S. T. B., Torsting, A. M., & Eplov, L. F.
Affiliations
  • Aalborg University (DK)
  • Mental Health Services (DK)
  • Sankt Hans Hospital (DK)
Venue
International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation
Published
2019-09-02
Volume
26
Issue
9
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 1741-1645 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-779X
OpenAlex
W2978221118
Cited by
17
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
occupational therapy, mental health, occupation-based intervention, activity-based intervention, social functioning, cognition, supported employment, supported education, horticulture, music therapy, art therapy, evidence-based practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review