Cited by 34Schizophrenia research and treatmentOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchArt Therapy and Mental Health

Development of an Individualized Occupational Therapy Programme and its Effects on the Neurocognition, Symptoms and Social Functioning of Patients with Schizophrenia

Shimada, Takeshi, Nishi, Ai, Yoshida, Tomotaka, Tanaka, Sachie, Kobayashi, Masayoshi·2016·Occupational Therapy International

Abstract

We described an individualized occupational therapy (IOT) programme and examined the effects of adding IOT to group OT (GOT) on improving neurocognition, symptoms and social functioning among recently hospitalized patients with schizophrenia. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia—Japanese version (BACS‐J), the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the Global Assessment of Functioning scale were used for outcome evaluations. Fifty‐one patients were voluntarily assigned to either the GOT + IOT (n = 30) or GOT alone (n = 21) groups based on their preferences. Retention in the GOT + IOT group was 100%. Three‐month baseline to discharge assessments in the GOT + IOT group showed significant improvements in BACS‐J verbal memory, working memory, verbal fluency, attention, executive function and composite score, and in PANSS positive subscale, general psychopathology subscale, and total score compared to the GOT alone group. Study limitations notwithstanding, the present findings provide preliminary support for the feasibility of implementing IOT and its effectiveness for improving cognitive impairment and symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The results of this study indicate that IOT in psychiatric facilities may improve psychosocial treatment of schizophrenia. Additional study is warranted to replicate the effects of IOT as demonstrated in this Japanese study. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/oti.1445

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shimada, T., Nishi, A., Yoshida, T., Tanaka, S., & Kobayashi, M.
Affiliations
  • Shinshu University (JP)
  • Medical Corporation Seitaikai Mental Support Soyokaze Hospital Nagano Japan
Venue
Occupational Therapy International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-10-17
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
425-435
ISSN
  • 0966-7903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-0703
OpenAlex
W2538449123
Cited by
34
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Occupational Therapy International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Mental Support Soyokaze Hospital
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
Keywords
schizophrenia, group occupational therapy, neurocognitive function, cognitive impairment, verbal memory, working memory, executive function, attention, positive symptoms, social functioning, psychiatric inpatients, psychosocial interventions, treatment retention
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Patient Care Planning, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Executive Function, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review