Cited by 27Attachment and Relationship DynamicsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsPersonality Traits and Psychology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Role of Adult Attachment Style in Online Social Network Affect, Cognition, and Behavior

Open access
Rom, Eldad, Alfasi, Yitshak·2014·Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research

Abstract

In the last decade, social network sites (SNS) have a major attendance in our everyday lives. Numerous studies have explored the antecedences and consequences of this novel phenomenon. The current study is yet another attempt in this direction. In this research we seek to explore the role of personality tendencies, namely the attachment system, in individuals' affect, cognitions, and behavior on what is presently considered as the most popular SNS - "Facebook". Over the years studies have continuously demonstrated that attachment theory is a relevant framework for understanding human behavior and has proven attachment tendencies to be significantly associated with quality of close relationships and daily social interactions. Since today virtual communication and social networks are capturing dominant aspects of social relationships, the linkage to attachment theory is evident. Hence, we approached 190 Israeli young adults, and asked them about their habits and daily routines on Facebook. We also measured their cognition and emotion concerning Facebook. Results show that attachment insecurity is associated with global orientations and emotions towards Facebook and that people develop attachment relationships with their Facebook network. We discuss the associations between attachment and virtual communication and its application for future theory and research.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12974/2313-1047.2014.01.01.3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books.
  2. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger. New York: Basic Books.
  3. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (2008), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  4. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Selfreport measurement of adult romantic attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46-76). New York: Guilford Press.
  5. Feeney, J. A. (1999). Issues of closeness and distance in dating relationships: Effects of sex and attachment style. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 571-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0265407599165002 · DOI
  6. Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barret, L. F. (1997). Working models of attachment and daily social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1409-1423. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1409 · DOI
  7. Davila, J. (2001). Refining the association between excessive reassurance seeking and depressive symptoms: The role of related interpersonal constructs. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 538-559. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.20.4.538.22394 · DOI
  8. Shaver, P. R., Schachner, D. A., & Mikulincer, M. (2005). Attachment style, excessive reassurance seeking, relationship processes, and depression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(3), 343-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271709 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Granqvist, P., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1088868309348618 · DOI
  10. Rom, E., & Mikulincer, M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 1220-1235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1220 · DOI
  11. Smith, E. R., Murphy, J., & Coats, S. (1999). Attachment to groups: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 94-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.94 · DOI
  12. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1991). Attachment and other affectional bonds across the life cycle. In C. M. Parks, J. Stevenson- Hinde, & P. Marris (Eds.), Attachment across the life cycle (pp. 33-51). New York: Routledge.
  13. Fraley, R. C., & Davis, K. E. (1997). Attachment formation and transfer in young adults' close friendship and romantic relationships. Personal Relationships, 4, 131-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00135.x · DOI
  14. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents' identity experiments on the internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35, 208-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650207313164 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship. Journal of Computer- Mediated Communication, 13, article 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · DOI · Paper page
  16. Freis, S. D., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2013). A Facebook analysis of helping behavior in online bullying. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030239 · DOI
  17. Ivcevic, Z., & Ambaby, N. (2012). Personality impressions from identity claims on Facebook. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 38-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027329 · DOI
  18. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A., Wright, S. L., & Hudiburg, L. (2012). The relationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33, 294-301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.08.001 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A.,Wright, S. L., & Johonson, B. D. (2013). The interrelationships among attachment style, personality traits, interpersonal competency, and Facebook use. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 2, 117-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030946 · DOI
  20. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook friends' social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1143-1168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Grasmuck, S., Martin, J., & Zhao, S. (2009). Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 15, 158-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01498.x · DOI
  22. Davidovitz, R., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Izsak, R., Popper, M. (2007). Leaders as attachment figures: Leaders' attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers' performance and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 632-650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.632 · DOI
  23. Florian, V., Mikulincer, M., & Bucholtz, I. (1995). Effects of adult attachment style on the perception of search for social support. Journal of Psychology, 129, 665-676. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1995.9914937 · DOI
  24. Mikulincer, M., & Florain, V. (1998). The relationship between adult attachment styles and emotional and cognitive reaction to stressful events. In J. A. Simpson, & W. S. Rholes, (Eds.) Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 143-165). New York: Guilford.
  25. Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P., & Rom, E. (2011). The effects of implicit and explicit security priming on creative problem solving. Cognition & Emotion, 25, 519-531. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2010.540110 · DOI
  26. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioural system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 53-152). New York: Academic Press. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Rowe, A. C., & Carnelley, K. B. (2005). Preliminary support for the use of a hierarchical mapping technique to examine attachment networks. Personal Relationships, 12, 499-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2005.00128.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rom, E., & Alfasi, Y.
Affiliations
College of Management Academic Studies (IL)
Venue
Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research
Published
2014-02-05
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
24-34
ISSN
2313-1047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313437488
Cited by
27
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Psychology and Psychotherapy Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
adult attachment styles, insecure attachment, social network sites, Facebook, social networking sites, virtual communication, attachment relationships, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review