Cited by 1,011Personality Traits and PsychologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMedia and Digital Communication

A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and the personality predictors of social media usage

Open access
Hughes, David John, Rowe, Moss, Batey, Mark, Lee, Andrew·2012·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2011.11.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies looking at similarities and differences among social platforms found differences with respect to user personalities, news spreading, or content sharing.

    “For instance, studies looking at similarities and differences among social platforms found differences with respect to user personalities (Hughes et al., 2012), news spreading (Lerman and Ghosh, 2010), or content sharing (Ottoni et al., 2014).”

    From Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019) · cites this paper as Hughes et al., 2012

  • Findings on the association between openness to experience and problematic Facebook use are inconsistent, with negative or non-significant associations.

    “Furthermore, people high in openness to experience have been observed to frequently find and share information (Hughes, Rowe, Batey, & Lee, 2012), but negative (e.g., Andreassen et al., 2013; Błachnio et al., 2017) or non-significant (e.g., Bodroža & Jovanović, 2016; Tang et al., 2016) associations have been found between this trait and PFU.”

    From A comprehensive meta-analysis on Problematic Facebook Use (2018) · cites this paper as Hughes, Rowe, Batey, & Lee, 2012

  • Previous studies have shown that personality traits may be associated with SNSs excessive use and addiction.

    “In addition to the factors in the TPB, previous studies have shown that personality traits may be associated with SNSs excessive use and addiction (Amichai-hamburger & Vinitzky, 2010;Hughes, Rowe, Batey, & Lee, 2012;Jenkins-Guarnieri, Wright, & Hudiburgh, 2012).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Chak, K., & Leung, L. (2004). Shyness and Locus of Control as Predictors of Internet Addiction and Internet Use. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 7(5), 559-570.
  2. Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook ''friends:" Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
  3. McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the ''true self'' on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 33-48.
  4. Zywica, J., & Danowski, J. (2008). The faces of Facebookers: Investigating social enhancement and social compensation hypotheses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(1), 1-34.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hughes, D. J., Rowe, M., Batey, M., & Lee, A.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Hughes, David John
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
561-569
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105543408
Cited by
1,011
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 68 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 109 · 2020: 105 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 104 · 2017: 95 · 2016: 88 · 2015: 94 · 2014: 65 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 16
FWCI
42.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure (University of Bath) (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • The University of Bath Online Publications Store (The University of Bath) (submittedVersion)
  • Coventry University Open Collections (Coventry university) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The Open Collections (Coventry University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
personality, social networking sites, Facebook, Twitter, Big Five personality traits, need for cognition, sociability, information seeking, social media use, age differences, gender differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review