Cited by 77Cybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingLegal and Social Justice Studies

Interpreting the Intentions of Internet Predators: An Examination of Online Predatory Behavior

Open access
Marcum, Catherine D.·2007·Journal of Child Sexual Abuse

Abstract

Internet predators are finding new ways to prey on the vulnerabilities of youth in chat rooms and lure them into sexual activities. This study will examine three chat room transcripts between adult predators and adult volunteers of the group "Perverted Justice" posing as youth. These conversations will be analyzed to interpret the underlying meanings behind the words and actions of the predators and how they affect potential victims. The purpose of this article is to provide insight to the reader of the increased amount of child sexual abuse on the Internet, the often-blatant tactics used by online predators to pursue this abuse, and how they are continuing to successfully manipulate children with them.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1300/j070v16n04_06

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The use of flattery ('sexy best ass') is arguably designed to ingratiate, in order to gain compliance with the request, as has been noted in previous research.

    “The use of flattery ('sexy best ass') is arguably designed to ingratiate, in order to gain compliance with the request, as has been noted in previous research (Black et al., 2015;Marcum, 2007;Williams et al., 2013;Winters et al., 2017).”

    From A discursive analysis of compliance, resistance and escalation to threats in sexually exploitative interactions between offenders and male children (2021) · cites this paper as Marcum, 2007

    The Abstract says predators use declarations of love and compassion to gain adolescents’ trust and obtain sex; Case Study #1 describes showing care and concern to gain trust before soliciting sex. These passages support the proposed ingratiation-and-compliance mechanism, but the paper does not specifically identify flattery or compliments as the tactic. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomas Wadsworth.
  2. Bachman, R., & Schutt, R. (2001). The practice of research in criminology and criminal justice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
  3. Baker, L. (2002). Protecting your children from sexual predators. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  4. Beebe, T., Asche, S., Harrison, P.,& Quinlan, K. (2004). Heightened vulnerability and increased risk-taking among adolescent chat room users: Results from a statewide school survey. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(2), 116-123.
  5. Creswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  6. Durkin, K., & Bryant, C. (1999). Propagandishing pederasty: A thematic analysis of the online exculpatory accounts of unrepentant pedophiles. Deviant Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 20, 103-127.
  7. Kendall, V. (1998). The lost child: Congress's inability to protect our teenagers. Northwestern University Law Review, 92(4), 1307-1315.
  8. McFarlane, M., Bull, S. S., & Rietmeijer, C. A. (2000). The Internet as a newly emerging risk environment for sexually transmitted diseases. Journal of the American Medication Association, 284, 443-446.
  9. Mitchell, K., Finkelhor, D.,&Wolak, J. (2003). Victimization of youth on the Internet. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment, & Trauma, 8, 1-39.
  10. Mitchell, K., Wolak, J.,&Finkelhor, D. (2005). Police posting as juveniles to catch sex offenders: Is it working? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 17, 241-267.
  11. Tarbox, K. (2000). Katie.com. New York: Penguin Group.
  12. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2003). Escaping or connecting? Characteristics of youth who form close online relationships. Journal of Adolescent Health, 26, 105-119.
  13. Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J., & Finkelhor, D. (2004). Internet-initiated sex crimes against minors: Implications for prevention based on findings from a national study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(5), 11-20.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcum, C. D.
Affiliations
Indiana University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Marcum, Catherine D.
Venue
Journal of Child Sexual Abuse
Published
2007-08-29
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
99-114
ISSN
  • 1053-8712 (ISSN-L)
  • 1547-0679
OpenAlex
W2098582024
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Child Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal and Social Justice Studies
Keywords
online predators, child sexual abuse, chat rooms, online grooming
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Abuse, Sexual, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Pedophilia, Safety, Sexual Behavior, Crime Victims, Internet, Vulnerable Populations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review