Cited by 27Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCybercrime and Law Enforcement StudiesChild Abuse and Trauma

Estrategias de persuasión en grooming online de menores: un análisis cualitativo con agresores en prisión

Open access
de Santisteban, Patricia, Gámez-Guadix, Manuel·2017·Psychosocial Intervention

Abstract

Online grooming (a process in which an adult gains the trust of a child with a view to making sexual contact of some type) is a serious social problem. Little is currently known about the specific strategies used by adults to manipulate and persuade children to engage in sexual interaction with them. For this study using qualitative methodology we undertook in-depth interviews with 12 men convicted for online grooming (aged between 21 and 51 years; M=38, SD=10.32). The information obtained was compared with an analysis of the proven facts of their convictions. The results that the principal manipulation strategies used by offenders are deception, corruption (e.g. offering money or gifts to children in return for sex), emotionally engaging the child, and aggression. These strategies attempt to actively involve or coerce the child in the abusive process to prevent disclosure. Prevention programmes could benefit enormously by incorporating empirical findings about the tactics and strategies used by offenders to manipulate and sexually exploit children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psi.2017.02.001

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hernández Sampieri, R., Fernández Collado, C. B. L., Valencia, M. D. P. M., Torres, S. y Paulina, C. (2014). Metodología de la investigación (No. 303.1). McGraw-Hill Education.
  2. S.13 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Santisteban, P., & Gámez-Guadix, M.
Venue
Psychosocial Intervention
Published
2017
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
139-146
ISSN
1132-0559 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2603531507
Cited by
27
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
4.07
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosocial Intervention (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
online grooming, child sexual exploitation, persuasion techniques, manipulation techniques, deception, corruption, emotional manipulation, aggression, sexual abuse prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review