The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Modern Prejudice Toward Gay Men and Lesbian Women
Abstract
This paper describes the psychometric properties of the Modern Homonegativity Scale (MHS), which measures contemporary negative attitudes toward gay men and lesbians (i.e., attitudes not based on traditional or moral objections to homosexuality). In Study 1 (N = 353), a preliminary version of the MHS was developed, and its psychometric properties were examined. Participants in Studies 2 and 3 (Ns = 308 and 233, respectively) completed the MHS and other attitudinal measures. The relationships among these variables were investigated to provide a more comprehensive assessment of the scale's construct validity. In Study 4 (N = 36), a behavioural expression of modern homonegativity was examined using the attributional ambiguity paradigm. The results of these studies indicate that the MHS is unidimensional, possesses a high degree of internal consistency, and is factorially distinct from a measure of old-fashioned homonegativity. As hypothesized, scores on the MHS correlated positively with political conservatism, religious behaviour, religious self-schema and modern sexism, but did not correlate significantly with social desirability bias. In addition, the MHS appears to be less susceptible to floor effects than a commonly used measure of old-fashioned homonegativity. Finally, the experimental study revealed that participants obtaining high scores on the MHS were less likely to sit beside individuals wearing T-shirts with pro-gay or pro-lesbian slogans when they could justify their seating choice on nonprejudicial grounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,867
Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research.
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.4.3.272 · Cited by 9,587
Reading and understanding multivariate statistics
Grimm, L. G., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995) · Cited by 2,234
Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism
(2005) · Understanding Critical Social Psychology · doi:10.4135/9781446217566.n6 · Cited by 1,774
Modern racism, ambivalence, and the Modern Racism Scale.
McConahay, J. B. (1986) · Cited by 1,687
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · Cited by 1,486
Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis
Rosenthal, R., & Wolf, F. M. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2071646 · Cited by 1,371
Heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences
Herek, G. M. (1988) · Journal of Sex Research · doi:10.1080/00224498809551476 · Cited by 1,273
(1995) · Cited by 1,191
A short version of the Attitudes toward Women Scale (AWS)
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R., & Stapp, J. (1973) · Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society · doi:10.3758/bf03329252 · Cited by 949
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- 10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.175 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.175
- 10.1086/268826 · doi:10.1086/268826
- 10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.463 · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.62.3.463 · Paper page
- 10.1300/J082v29n01_05 · doi:10.1300/j082v29n01_05
- Simoni J. M., 1996, Journal of College Student Development, 37, 68
- 10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2297 · Paper page
- 10.1300/J082v34n02_04 · doi:10.1300/j082v34n02_04
Cited by
Sexual Orientation Microaggressions: “Death by a Thousand Cuts” for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Youth
Nadal, K. L., Issa, M.-A., Leon, J., Meterko, V., Wideman, M., & Wong, Y. (2011) · Journal of LGBT Youth · doi:10.1080/19361653.2011.584204 · Cited by 414
Religiosity and Attitudes Toward Lesbians and Gay Men: A Meta-Analysis
Whitley, B. E. (2009) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508610802471104 · Cited by 412
RETRACTED: Structural stigma and all-cause mortality in sexual minority populations
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Bellatorre, A., Lee, Y., Finch, B. K., Muennig, P., & Fiscella, K. (2014) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.005 · Cited by 340
RetractedKlocke, U. (2024) · Journal of Homosexuality · doi:10.1080/00918369.2022.2122368 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Homosexuality
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-03-13
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 15-37
- ISSN
- 0091-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-3602
- OpenAlex
- W2001104120
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Modern Prejudice Toward Gay Men and Lesbian Women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1300/j082v43n02_02
- The paper
- Morrison, M. A., & Morrison, T. G. (2003). Development and Validation of a Scale Measuring Modern Prejudice Toward Gay Men and Lesbian Women. Journal of Homosexuality. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v43n02_02
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.