The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: Two-year clinical results
Abstract
We have previously reported the short-term radiological results of a randomised controlled trial comparing kinematically aligned total knee replacement (TKR) and mechanically aligned TKR, along with early pain and function scores. In this study we report the two-year clinical results from this trial. A total of 88 patients (88 knees) were randomly allocated to undergo either kinematically aligned TKR using patient-specific guides, or mechanically aligned TKR using conventional instruments. They were analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. The patients and the clinical evaluator were blinded to the method of alignment. At a minimum of two years, all outcomes were better for the kinematically aligned group, as determined by the mean Oxford knee score (40 (15 to 48) versus 33 (13 to 48); p = 0.005), the mean Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis index (WOMAC) (15 (0 to 63) versus 26 (0 to 73); p = 0.005), mean combined Knee Society score (160 (93 to 200) versus 137 (64 to 200); p= 0.005) and mean flexion of 121° (100 to 150) versus 113° (80 to 130) (p = 0.002). The odds ratio of having a pain-free knee at two years with the kinematically aligned technique (Oxford and WOMAC pain scores) was 3.2 (p = 0.020) and 4.9 (p = 0.001), respectively, compared with the mechanically aligned technique. Patients in the kinematically aligned group walked a mean of 50 feet further in hospital prior to discharge compared with the mechanically aligned group (p = 0.044). In this study, the use of a kinematic alignment technique performed with patient-specific guides provided better pain relief and restored better function and range of movement than the mechanical alignment technique performed with conventional instruments. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:907–13.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rationale, of The Knee Society Clinical Rating System
INSALL, J. N., DORR, L. D., SCOTT, R. D., & NORMAN, W. (1989) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00004 · Cited by 4,793
Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
Bourne, R. B., Chesworth, B. M., Davis, A. M., Mahomed, N. N., & Charron, K. D. J. (2010) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9 · Cited by 2,569
The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores
Murray, D. W., Fitzpatrick, R., Rogers, K., Pandit, H., Beard, D. J., Carr, A. J., & Dawson, J. (2007) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b8.19424 · Cited by 1,452
Bellemans, J., Colyn, W., Vandenneucker, H., & Victor, J. (2012) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5 · Cited by 1,085
Baker, P. N., van der Meulen, J. H., Lewsey, J., & Gregg, P. J. (2007) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.89b7.19091 · Cited by 975
The Axes of Rotation of the Knee
HOLLISTER, A. M., JATANA, S., SINGH, A. K., SULLIVAN, W. W., & LUPICHUK, A. G. (1993) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199305000-00033 · Cited by 502
Howell, S. M., Howell, S. J., Kuznik, K. T., Cohen, J., & Hull, M. L. (2013) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z · Cited by 495
Chronic Opioid Use Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty
Zywiel, M. G., Stroh, D. A., Lee, S. Y., Bonutti, P. M., & Mont, M. A. (2011) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01473 · Cited by 379
Howell, S. M., Papadopoulos, S., Kuznik, K. T., & Hull, M. L. (2013) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2621-x · Cited by 366
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MECHANICS, KINEMATICS, AND MORPHOLOGY OF THE KNEE VIEWED IN VIRTUAL REALITY
ECKHOFF, D. G., BACH, J. M., SPITZER, V. M., REINIG, K. D., BAGUR, M. M., BALDINI, T. H., & FLANNERY, N. M. P. (2005) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200511002-00009 · Cited by 293
Cited by
MacDessi, S. J., Griffiths-Jones, W., Harris, I. A., Bellemans, J., & Chen, D. B. (2021) · The Bone & Joint Journal · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.103b2.bjj-2020-1050.r1 · Cited by 738
Young, S. W., Walker, M. L., Bayan, A., Briant-Evans, T., Pavlou, P., & Farrington, B. (2017) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4844-x · Cited by 256
Calliess, T., Bauer, K., Stukenborg-Colsman, C., Windhagen, H., Budde, S., & Ettinger, M. (2017) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4136-8 · Cited by 245
Blakeney, W., Clément, J., Desmeules, F., Hagemeister, N., Rivière, C., & Vendittoli, P. (2019) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1 · Cited by 198
Winnock de Grave, P., Luyckx, T., Claeys, K., Tampere, T., Kellens, J., Müller, J., & Gunst, P. (2022) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-020-06165-4 · Cited by 174
Metadata
- Authors
- Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W., & Kwasman, B. G.
- Venue
- The Bone & Joint Journal
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 96-B
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 907-913
- ISSN
- 2049-4394 (ISSN-L)
- 2049-4408
- OpenAlex
- W2188187560
- Cited by
- 431
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 27.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: Two-year clinical results. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812
- The paper
- Dossett, H. G., Estrada, N. A., Swartz, G. J., LeFevre, G. W., & Kwasman, B. G. (2014). A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: Two-year clinical results. The Bone & Joint Journal. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.96b7.32812
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
