The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Storage Temperature Effects on Proteolysis in Alfalfa Silage
Abstract
ABSTRACT FIRST and third cutting alfalfa was ensiled in mini-silos (100 ml centrifuge tubes) at 40 or 55% dry matter and incubated at 15, 25 or 35 C for 40 days. In both trials and at both dry matter levels, the amount of proteolysis increased with storage temperature, averaging 10 percentage units as a fraction of total nitrogen between 15 and 35 C. Increasing storage temperature also elevated ammonia concentrations between 15 and 25 C but not between 25 and 35 C. The results of this study indicated that temperature affected the rate of loss of protease activity during fermentation, based on simulations using the silage model of Pitt et al. (1985) as modified by Muck (1987). The experiments suggest that management practices that control or reduce silage temperature may be important in maximizing the amount of nitrogen in alfalfa which remains as true protein through ensiling.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Proteolysis, the breakdown of plant proteins to free AA, peptides, and ammonia, is also affected by temperature, with rates doubling for every 10°C increase between 10 and 38°C (Muck and Dickerson, 1988).”
From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Muck and Dickerson, 1988
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages
Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R. J., Holmes, B. J., & Muck, R. E. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-13837 · Cited by 802
Self-citationFactors Influencing Silage Quality and Their Implications for Management.
Muck, R. E. (1988) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(88)79897-5 · Cited by 419
Self-citationChanges in Forage Quality During Harvest and Storage
Rotz, C. A., & Muck, R. E. (1994) · ASSA, CSSA and SSSA · doi:10.2134/1994.foragequality.c20 · Cited by 249
Self-citationHoffman, P. C., Esser, N. M., Shaver, R. D., Coblentz, W. K., Scott, M. P., Bodnar, A. L., Schmidt, R. J., & Charley, R. C. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3562 · Cited by 249
Bal, M. A., Shaver, R. D., Jirovec, A. G., Shinners, K. J., & Coors, J. G. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74993-9 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Muck, R. E., & Dickerson, J. T.
- Venue
- Transactions of the ASAE
- Published
- 1988
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1005-1009
- ISSN
- 0001-2351 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-0059
- OpenAlex
- W1975613344
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 1.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transactions of the ASAE (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Keywords
- alfalfa silage, proteolysis, storage temperature, ammonia, proteolytic activity, silage fermentation, dry matter content, nitrogen retention, true protein
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review