Cited by 24Aquaculture disease management and microbiotaMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyCrustacean biology and ecology

Bacterial communities associated with white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae at early developmental stages

Open access
PANGASTUTI, ARTINI, SUWANTO, ANTONIUS, LESTARI, YULIN, SUHARTONO, MAGGY TENNAWIJAYA·2009·Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity

Abstract

Bacterial communities associated with white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae at early developmental stages. Biodiversitas 11 (2): 65-68.Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (T-RFLP) was used to monitor the dynamics of the bacterial communities associated with early developmental stages of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) larvae. Samples for analysis were egg, hatching nauplii, 24 hours old nauplii, and 48 hours old nauplii which were collected from one cycle of production at commercial hatchery. TRFLPresults indicated that the bacterial community associated with early stages of shrimp development might be transferred vertically from broodstock via egg. There was no significant difference between bacterial communities investigated, except the bacterial community of 48 hours old nauplii. Diversity analyses showed that the bacterial community of egg had the highest diversity and evenness, meanwhile the bacterial community of 48 hours old nauplii had the lowest diversity. Nine phylotypes were found at all stages with high abundance. Those TRFs were identified as γ- proteobacteria, α-proteobacteria, and bacteroidetes group.Key words: Litopenaeus vannamei, bacterial community, T-RFLP

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13057/biodiv/d110203

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
PANGASTUTI, A., SUWANTO, A., LESTARI, Y., & SUHARTONO, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Sebelas Maret University (ID)
  • IPB University (ID)
Venue
Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity
Publisher
UNS Solo
Published
2009-11-14
Volume
11
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 1412-033X (ISSN-L)
  • 2085-4722
OpenAlex
W2013878255
Cited by
24
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
Keywords
Litopenaeus vannamei, bacterial communities, vertical transmission, broodstock, nauplii, egg stage, bacterial diversity, Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, shrimp hatchery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review