Cited by 6Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumChild Abuse and Trauma

Recalled parental rearing behavior in adult women and men with depressive and anxiety symptoms: findings from a community study

Klein, Eva M., Brähler, Elmar, Petrowski, Katja, Tibubos, Ana Nanette, Burghardt, Juliane, Wiltink, Jörg, Michal, Matthias, Wild, Philipp S. +6 more·2020·Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie

Abstract

Objectives: Addressing the lack of population-based data, the purpose of this representative study was to assess sex- and age-specific associations of maternal and paternal rearing behavior with depressiveness and anxiety controlling for sociodemographic and somatic variables. Methods: 8,175 subjects participating in a population-based study completed standardized questionnaires measuring Recalled Parental Rearing Behavior and distress. Results: Women recalled their fathers as more controlling and warmer, and their mothers as more rejecting than men. Comparisons between age groups (≤ 60 vs. > 60 years) revealed that younger participants recalled more parental control and emotional warmth. In addition to sociodemographic and somatic risk factors, paternal rejection and maternal control were associated with depressiveness and anxiety both for women and men (OR 1.58-1.96; OR 1.37-1.66). Maternal warmth was negatively related to distress (OR 0.66-0.69). Conclusions: Findings suggested sex- and age-specific differences in recalled maternal and paternal rearing behavior. The current results highlighted the important role of recalled parental rearing behavior besides sociodemographic factors and somatic diseases for the occurrence of depression and anxiety symptoms across the age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.13109/zptm.2020.66.3.243

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, E. M., Brähler, E., Petrowski, K., Tibubos, A. N., Burghardt, J., Wiltink, J., Michal, M., Wild, P. S., Schulz, A., Münzel, T., König, J., Lackner, K., Pfeiffer, N., & Beutel, M. E.
Affiliations
University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie
Published
2020-09-02
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
243-258
ISSN
  • 1438-3608 (ISSN-L)
  • 2196-8349
OpenAlex
W3082860425
Cited by
6
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.30
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Zeitschrift für psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
maternal care, depression, anxiety, sex differences, age differences, parental rejection, parental control, maternal warmth, childhood adversity, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Rearing, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Fathers, Female, Humans, Male, Mothers, Surveys and Questionnaires, Mental Recall, Residence Characteristics, Sex Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review