Cited by 71Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and TraumaPsychology and Mental Health

Parental lack of care and overprotection: Longitudinal associations with DSM-III-R disorders

Overbeek, Geertjan, ten Have, Margreet, Vollebergh, Wilma, de Graaf, Ron·2007·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background This study served to replicate and extend the findings from the National Comorbidity Survey [Enns MW, Cox BJ, Clara I (2002) Psychol Med 32:997-1008], in examining associations between recalled parental bonding and the prevalence and incidence of mental disorders in adulthood. Methods Data were used from 4,796 adults aged 18-64, who had participated in three waves (i.e., 1996, 1997, and 1999) of a large-scale Dutch epidemiological study. Results Parental lack of care and overprotection were significantly associated with both prevalence and incidence of DSM-III-R disorders. However, the impact of parental bonding was modest, explaining only 1-5% of the variance in the occurrence and onset of psychopathology. Chi-square tests demonstrated there were no differences between the impact of paternal and maternal rearing behaviors on mental disorders, or between lack of care and overprotection in the prediction of mental disorders. Conclusions Overall, individuals' recollections of parental lack of care and overprotection appear to be non-specifically, modestly related to the prevalence and incidence of DSM-III-R disorders in adults from the general population. Future research may examine indirect or mediated links between parental bonding and (clinical diagnoses of) mental health problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-006-0115-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overbeek, G., ten Have, M., Vollebergh, W., & de Graaf, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Overbeek, Geertjan
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2006-09-14
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
87-93
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2092950140
Cited by
71
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
parental bonding, parental overprotection, adult mental disorders, prevalence of mental disorders, replication study, National Comorbidity Survey
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Child, Child Care, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parent-Child Relations, Parents, Time Factors, Incidence, Parenting, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review