Cited by 306Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and ApplicationsAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

The analysis of repeated measures designs: A review

Keselman, H. J., Algina, James, Kowalchuk, Rhonda K.·2001·British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology

Abstract

Repeated measures ANOVA can refer to many different types of analysis. Specifically, this vague term can refer to conventional tests of significance, one of three univariate solutions with adjusted degrees of freedom, two different types of multivariate statistic, or approaches that combine univariate and multivariate tests. Accordingly, it is argued that, by only reporting probability values and referring to statistical analyses as repeated measures ANOVA, authors convey neither the type of analysis that was used nor the validity of the reported probability value, since each of these approaches has its own strengths and weaknesses. The various approaches are presented with a discussion of their strengths and weaknesses, and recommendations are made regarding the ‘best’ choice of analysis. Additional topics discussed include analyses for missing data and tests of linear contrasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/000711001159357

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keselman, H. J., Algina, J., & Kowalchuk, R. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Keselman, H. J.
Venue
British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 0007-1102 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8317
OpenAlex
W2125118056
Cited by
306
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
repeated measures ANOVA, multivariate analysis of variance, univariate analysis, missing data, linear contrasts, statistical reporting
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Probability, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review