Cited by 248Psychology Research and BibliometricsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceMeta-analysis and systematic reviews

Analysis of Variance Frameworks in Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology: Issues and Recommendations

Jaccard, James, Guilamo-Ramos, Vincent·2002·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

Reviewed existing practices of factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA), a major analytic tool used in clinical child and adolescent psychology, in the Journal of Clinical Child Psychology (JCCP) and noted several suboptimal strategies. Issues surrounding the analysis of multiple outcome variables, omnibus F tests, and single degree of freedom contrasts, simple main effects analysis, and single degree of freedom interaction contrasts were considered and recommendations were made about analytic strategies. Among the practices questioned were the use of multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) as a means of controlling Type I errors across multiple outcome variables and the use of simple main effects analysis to elucidate the nature of interaction effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15374424jccp3101_15

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaccard, J., & Guilamo-Ramos, V.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2002-02-02
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
130-146
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W1974610070
Cited by
248
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
FWCI
18.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Keywords
factorial analysis of variance, multivariate analysis of variance, type I error control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Analysis of Variance, Child, Psychology, Child, Humans, Psychotherapy, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review