Cited by 63Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingMedia and Digital Communication

In their words: Connecting on‐line weblogs to developmental processes

Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Garcia, Eddie C. M., Harsono, Lidwina Stella, Li, Janice S., Lipana, Lawrence·2009·British Journal of Developmental Psychology

Abstract

This paper seeks to connect adolescents' communication within on‐line weblogs or blogs to developmental processes. A total of 195 English language blogs written by self‐identified 14‐ to 18‐year‐olds were selected; three entries from each blog were analysed, resulting in a sample of 585 entries. Blogger demographics, self‐presentation, and blog entries (format, style, content, and tone) were coded. The blog authors in our sample were overwhelmingly female and lived within the US; the majority were between 15‐ and 16‐years of age. Bloggers utilized usernames and userpictures for self‐presentation and in addition to gender, frequently presented information about their age and location. The majority of the entries used text, were narrative and reflective in style, and contained themes related to their authors' peers and everyday life. Emotional tone was present and entries with romantic, identity, and future‐related themes often contained emotional tone. Blog authors seemed to be using blogs to create narratives and to reflect about the people and events in their lives. Our results show that adolescent bloggers project off‐line themes to their blogs, suggesting that their on‐line and off‐line contexts are psychologically connected.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/026151008x345979

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Three qualitative studies found that those who got feedback from their audience reinforced their self-concept clarity.

    “Three qualitative studies found that those who got feedback from their audience reinforced their self-concept clarity (Bell, 2019; Guzzetti & Gamboa, 2005; Subrahmanyam et al., 2009).”

    From A Systematic Review of Social Media Use and Adolescent Identity Development (2025) · cites this paper as Subrahmanyam et al., 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subrahmanyam, K., Garcia, E. C. M., Harsono, L. S., Li, J. S., & Lipana, L.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri
Venue
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
219-245
ISSN
  • 0261-510X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-835X
OpenAlex
W2023910814
Cited by
63
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 12
FWCI
20.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Florida Digital Commons (University of North Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
blogs, adolescents, online communication, self-presentation, identity construction, emotional tone, narrative, reflection, gender differences, peer relationships
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Communication, Female, Humans, Individuality, Individuation, Male, Peer Group, Personality Development, Self Disclosure, Internet, Narration, Blogging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review