Cited by 56Impact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital TechnologyMedia and Digital Communication

Virtual worlds in development: Implications of social networking sites

Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Greenfield, Patricia M.·2008·Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subrahmanyam, K., & Greenfield, P. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Subrahmanyam, Kaveri
Venue
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-11
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
417-419
ISSN
0193-3973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133701374
Cited by
56
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Florida Digital Commons (University of North Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social networking sites, youth, online social behavior, online friendship, user-generated content, news feeds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review