The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility
Abstract
Using a sample of 211 working adults, an instigated workplace incivility measure, distinct from an experienced workplace incivility and general interpersonal deviance measures, was developed. Correlates of instigated workplace incivility were then tested using 162 medical technologists over a 4‐year time frame. Results indicated that Time 1 measures of distributive justice and job satisfaction were negatively related to instigated workplace incivility, while a Time 1 measure of work exhaustion was positively related to such incivility. Furthermore, these three antecedents contributed significantly to explaining instigated workplace incivility, beyond Time 2 measures of these three variables. Future research issues, as well as study limitations, are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1975) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0076546 · Cited by 7,246
Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.
Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 · Cited by 5,942
A meta-analytic examination of the correlates of the three dimensions of job burnout
Lee, R. T., & Ashforth, B. E. (1996) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.123 · Cited by 3,262 · cited 1×
“Lim (1996) found that job insecurity was positively related to self-reported noncompliant job behaviours (e.”
BackgroundA Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
‘Burnout’, absence and turnover amongst British nursing staff
Firth, H., & Britton, P. (1989) · Journal of Occupational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1989.tb00477.x · Cited by 249
Cited by
Chiaburu, D. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1082 · Cited by 1,297
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/jcom.12104 · Cited by 964
Hershcovis, M. S. (2011) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.689 · Cited by 893
A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes
Alarcon, G. M. (2011) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007 · Cited by 845
SPENCE LASCHINGER, H. K., LEITER, M., DAY, A., & GILIN, D. (2009) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2834.2009.00999.x · Cited by 730
Metadata
- Authors
- Blau, G., & Andersson, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 595-614
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2105567654
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 9.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317905x26822
- The paper
- Blau, G., & Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x26822
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
