The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extending the demands‐control model: A daily diary study of job characteristics, work‐family conflict and work‐family facilitation
Abstract
Using personal digital assistants, 91 parents employed in non‐professional occupations were surveyed for 14 consecutive days about their job characteristics and work‐family experiences. We found significant daily variation in work‐to‐family conflict (WFC) and work‐to‐family facilitation (WFF) that was predictable from daily job characteristics. Higher levels of WFC were associated with greater job demands and control at work. Contrary to the demands‐control model (), these two job characteristics interacted such that the relationship between demands and WFC was stronger when control was high. We also found that demands were negatively related and control and skill level positively related to WFF. The results suggest ways in which jobs may be redesigned to enhance individuals' work‐family experiences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research.
Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E. L., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278 · Cited by 2,767
Sonnentag, S. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518 · Cited by 1,851
Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models
Singer, J. D. (1998) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.2307/1165280 · Cited by 1,092
Cited by
Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward.
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000056 · Cited by 6,979
The job demands–resources model: challenges for future research.
Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2011) · SA Journal of Industrial Psychology · doi:10.4102/sajip.v37i2.974 · Cited by 1,426
Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers.
Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1348/096317909x402596 · Cited by 1,249
Ilies, R., Schwind, K. M., Wagner, D. T., Johnson, M. D., DeRue, D. S., & Ilgen, D. R. (2007) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368 · Cited by 509
Shockley, K. M., Shen, W., DeNunzio, M. M., Arvan, M. L., & Knudsen, E. A. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000246 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- B. Butler, A., G. Grzywacz, J., L. Bass, B., & D. Linney, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-169
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2113692562
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 36.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the demands‐control model: A daily diary study of job characteristics, work‐family conflict and work‐family facilitation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317905x40097
- The paper
- B. Butler, A., G. Grzywacz, J., L. Bass, B., & D. Linney, K. (2005). Extending the demands‐control model: A daily diary study of job characteristics, work‐family conflict and work‐family facilitation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x40097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
