CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 509Work-Family Balance ChallengesWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

When can employees have a family life? The effects of daily workload and affect on work-family conflict and social behaviors at home.

Open access
Ilies, Remus, Schwind, Kelly M., Wagner, David T., Johnson, Michael D., DeRue, D. Scott, Ilgen, Daniel R.·2007·Journal of Applied Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article presents a longitudinal examination of antecedents and outcomes of work-to-family conflict. A total of 106 employees participating in an experience-sampling study were asked to respond to daily surveys both at work and at home, and their spouses were interviewed daily via telephone for a period of 2 weeks. Intraindividual analyses revealed that employees' perceptions of workload predicted work-to-family conflict over time, even when controlling for the number of hours spent at work. Workload also influenced affect at work, which in turn influenced affect at home. Finally, perhaps the most interesting finding in this study was that employees' behaviors in the family domain (reported by spouses) were predicted by the employees' perceptions of work-to-family conflict and their positive affect at home.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failure to enact required roles may intensify feelings of anxiety and may prevent individuals from engagement in social or family interactions.

    “As argued above, failure to enact required roles may intensify feelings of anxiety (Ilies, Schwind, Wagner, Johnson, DeRue, & Ilgen, 2007) and may prevent individuals from engagement in social or family interactions.”

    From Killing Me Softly: Organizational E-mail Monitoring Expectations’ Impact on Employee and Significant Other Well-Being (2021) · cites this paper as Ilies, Schwind, Wagner, Johnson, DeRue, & Ilgen, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilies, R., Schwind, K. M., Wagner, D. T., Johnson, M. D., DeRue, D. S., & Ilgen, D. R.
ORCID
Johnson, Michael D.
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
2007
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
1368-1379
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
DOI
10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1368
OpenAlex
W2154182974
Cited by
509
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 25
FWCI
62.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archivio istituzionale della Ricerca - Bocconi (submittedVersion)
Funders
Purdue University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
work-to-family conflict, work-family conflict, positive affect, family behavior, within-person variability, work-family spillover
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Conflict, Psychological, Employment, Family, Female, Humans, Male, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review