The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work
Abstract
The experience sampling method is used to measure variance over time in events, moods, and behaviours in the work setting via palmtop computers in a sample of 41 employees. Theoretical propositions about event–mood–behaviour relations are derived from Affective Events Theory () and tested using within‐ and between‐persons variance. The experiment found 56% of the variance in hedonic tone of mood was within‐ rather than between‐persons. Hedonic tone was significantly related to both positive and negative work events in expected directions. The relationship between negative events and mood was approximately five times stronger than that between positive events and mood, even though positive events were reported three to five times more frequently than negative events. Hedonic tone was positively related to engaging in work withdrawal and negatively related to engaging in work tasks. Implications of these findings as well as the use of experience sampling for the study of dynamic workplace variables are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630002600307 · Cited by 5,897
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156 · Cited by 1,797
On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect.
Russell, J. A., & Carroll, J. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.1.3 · Cited by 1,481 · cited 1×
“We inserted a space between the 0 ¼ not at all option and the other options to distinguish not feeling a specific mood from feeling it to differing degrees (Russell & Carroll, 1999).”
MethodTotterdell, P. (2000) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.848 · Cited by 525
Cited by
7 Emotion in Organizations: A Review and Theoretical Integration
Elfenbein, H. A. (2007) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/078559812 · Cited by 1,035
Charisma, positive emotions and mood contagion
Bono, J. E., & Ilies, R. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.04.008 · Cited by 905
Glomb, T. M., Duffy, M. K., Bono, J. E., & Yang, T. (2011) · Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management · doi:10.1108/s0742-7301(2011)0000030005 · Cited by 809
Self-citationBeal, D. J. (2015) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335 · Cited by 436
Trougakos, J. P., Beal, D. J., Green, S. G., & Weiss, H. M. (2008) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2008.30764063 · Cited by 400
Metadata
- Authors
- G. Miner, A., M. Glomb, T., & Hulin, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-06
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-193
- ISSN
- 0963-1798 (ISSN-L)
- 2044-8325
- OpenAlex
- W2154637502
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/096317905x40105
- The paper
- G. Miner, A., M. Glomb, T., & Hulin, C. (2005). Experience sampling mood and its correlates at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905x40105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
