The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage
Abstract
Acquired prosopagnosia varies in both behavioural manifestations and the location and extent of underlying lesions. We studied 10 patients with adult‐onset lesions on a battery of face‐processing tests. Using signal detection methods, we found that discriminative power for the familiarity of famous faces was most reduced by bilateral occipitotemporal lesions that involved the fusiform gyri, and better preserved with unilateral right‐sided lesions. Tests of perception of facial structural configuration showed severe deficits with lesions that included the right fusiform gyrus, whether unilateral or bilateral. This deficit was most consistent for eye configuration, with some patients performing normally for mouth configuration. Patients with anterior temporal lesions had better configuration perception, though at least one patient showed a more subtle failure to integrate configural data from different facial regions. Facial imagery, an index of facial memories, was severely impaired by bilateral lesions that included the right anterior temporal lobe and marginally impaired by fusiform lesions alone; unilateral right fusiform lesions tended to spare imagery for facial features. These findings suggest that (1) prosopagnosia is more severe with bilateral than unilateral lesions, indicating a minor contribution of the left hemisphere to face recognition, (2) perception of facial configuration critically involves the right fusiform gyrus and (3) access to facial memories is most disrupted by bilateral lesions that also include the right anterior temporal lobe. This supports assertions that more apperceptive variants of prosopagnosia are linked to fusiform damage, whereas more associative variants are linked to anterior temporal damage. Next, we found that behavioural indices of covert recognition correlated with measures of overt familiarity, consistent with theories that covert behaviour emerges from the output of damaged neural networks, rather than alternative pathways. Finally, to probe the face specificity of the prosopagnosic defect, we tested recognition of fruits and vegetables: While face specificity was not found in most of our patients, the data of one patient suggested that this may be possible with more focal lesions of the right fusiform gyrus.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Haxby, J. V., Hoffman, E. A., & Gobbini, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01482-0 · Cited by 4,891
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 3,912
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. E. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,584
FUNCTIONAL NEUROANATOMY OF FACE AND OBJECT PROCESSING: A POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY STUDY
SERGENT, J., OHTA, S., & MACDONALD, B. (1992) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/115.1.15 · Cited by 1,517
Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise.
Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107 · Cited by 1,301
Mental Imagery of Faces and Places Activates Corresponding Stimulus-Specific Brain Regions
O'Craven, K. M., & Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/08989290051137549 · Cited by 1,055
Prosopagnosia: Anatomic basis and behavioral mechanisms
Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1982) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.32.4.331 · Cited by 1,006
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987
Domain specificity in face perception
Kanwisher, N. (2000) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/77664 · Cited by 968
Cited by
Electrical Stimulation of Human Fusiform Face-Selective Regions Distorts Face Perception
Parvizi, J., Jacques, C., Foster, B. L., Withoft, N., Rangarajan, V., Weiner, K. S., & Grill-Spector, K. (2012) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2609-12.2012 · Cited by 352
Rossion, B., Hanseeuw, B., & Dricot, L. (2012) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2012.01.001 · Cited by 269
Rangarajan, V., Hermes, D., Foster, B. L., Weiner, K. S., Jacques, C., Grill-Spector, K., & Parvizi, J. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0527-14.2014 · Cited by 226
Hernández, S. E., Suero, J., Barros, A., González-Mora, J. L., & Rubia, K. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150757 · Cited by 120
A cross-validated cytoarchitectonic atlas of the human ventral visual stream
Rosenke, M., Weiner, K. S., Barnett, M. A., Zilles, K., Amunts, K., Goebel, R., & Grill-Spector, K. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.040 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, J. J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuropsychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-03
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 197-225
- ISSN
- 1748-6645 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-6653
- OpenAlex
- W2071967540
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1348/174866407x214172
- The paper
- Barton, J. J. S. (2008). Structure and function in acquired prosopagnosia: Lessons from a series of 10 patients with brain damage. Journal of Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1348/174866407x214172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.