Cited by 8

Social and Environmental Predictors of Alcohol-Related Legal Infractions in College Students

Juth, Vanessa, Smyth, Joshua M, Thompson, Kevin, Nodes, Jennifer·2010·Journal of College Student Development

Abstract

Research on alcohol consumption among college students is often limited by self-reported outcomes and a narrow focus of predictor factors. This study examined both traditional risk factors for alcohol use as well as broader factors (e.g., weather, seasons) in predicting objective negative outcomes of alcohol use—alcohol-related legal infractions (ARLIs) derived from legal records and university citations for one calendar year. ARLIs significantly increased during rush week (p = .01) and football game days (p < .0001). ARLIs were significantly more prevalent during weekends (p < .0001) and autumn (p < .005) and showed some weather sensitivity (e.g., temperature, snowfall). Findings provide evidence for traditional risk factors increasing the prevalence of objective negative consequences (i.e., ARLIs) and further support the need to broaden the range of variables in the study of drinking behaviors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/csd.0.0139

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students who join for alcohol exposure perpetuate heavy alcohol consumption in fraternities and sororities and the stereotype of fraternity and sorority members as binge drinkers.

    “Students who join for this reason perpetuate the heavy alcohol consumption in fraternities and sororities and the stereotype of fraternity and sorority members as binge drinkers (i.e., people who consume five or more alcoholic beverages in a single sitting; Juth, Smyth, Thompson, & Nodes, 2010;Larimer, Turner, Mallett, & Geisner, 2004;Riordan & Dana, 1998).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Juth, V., Smyth, J. M., Thompson, K., & Nodes, J.
Venue
Journal of College Student Development
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2010-07
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
373-384
ISSN
1543-3382
Cited by
8
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review