Cited by 439Mental Health Research TopicsDigital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health via Writing

Ecological momentary assessment research in behavioral medicine

Smyth, Joshua M., Stone, Arthur A.·2003·Journal of Happiness Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023657221954

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smyth, J. M., & Stone, A. A.
Affiliations
Syracuse University (US)
Corresponding author
Smyth, Joshua M.
Venue
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2003-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
35-52
ISSN
  • 1389-4978 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7780
OpenAlex
W1493363413
Cited by
439
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 23
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Happiness Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
ecological momentary assessment, behavioral medicine, naturalistic data collection, implementation barriers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review