Cited by 253Disability Education and EmploymentDisability Rights and RepresentationInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Qualitative Analysis of the Barriers College Students With Disabilities Experience in Higher Education

Hong, Barbara S. S.·2015·Journal of College Student Development

Abstract

Students with disabilities are increasingly enrolling in colleges and universities. However, many institutions are still unprepared to support them beyond the basic federal mandate of equal access and reasonable accommodations. This qualitative study utilized a nontraditional media of reflective journaling to capture the anecdotal experiences of 16 college students with disabilities for a 10-week period. Four major themes emerged concerning barriers and frustrations these students encountered on a daily basis: (a) faculty perception, (b) fit of advisors, (c) college stressors, and (d) quality of support services. Recommendations for higher education administrators and disability personnel to become more vigilant in improving support for this population are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/csd.2015.0032

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Common barriers to full inclusion mentioned by students in higher education include negative faculty attitudes, stigma, college stressors, quality and accessibility of disability support services, inaccessible course design and digital materials, finances, and balancing academic and social lives.

    “In the HE context, common barriers to full inclusion that have been mentioned by students include negative faculty attitudes [50, 76, 85, 103], stigma [112], college stressors [50], the quality and accessibility of disability support services [50, 78], inaccessible course design and digital materials [78, 102], fi nances [109], and balancing academic and social lives [59, 75, 78].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hong, B. S. S.
Corresponding author
Hong, Barbara S. S.
Venue
Journal of College Student Development
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2015-04
Volume
56
Issue
3
Pages
209-226
ISSN
  • 0897-5264 (ISSN-L)
  • 1543-3382
OpenAlex
W2097580346
Cited by
253
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4
FWCI
30.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of college student development (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
students with disabilities, university students with disabilities, barriers to higher education, faculty perception, academic advising, student stress, disability services, reasonable accommodation, student experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review