The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Disappearing Acts: Reclaiming Intersectionality in the Social Sciences in a Post-Black Feminist Era
Abstract
The article investigates how post-black feminist definitions of intersectionality in the social sciences have "disappeared" black women as knowledge producers and subjects of investigation. This post-black feminist turn in theorizing intersectionality is assessed in terms of the rhetorical strategies critiqued by Kimberlé Crenshaw (1989, 1990-91) in her foundational work on intersectionality, demonstrating how the very strategies she identified as hegemonic limitations to black feminism have been incorporated into social science work produced in the name of intersectional investigation, thus re-subjugating black women's knowledge. A reconstructive liberatory project in the name of intersectionality is suggested that would entail scholars across the disciplines implementing hermeneutical and/or narrative methodologies that center on black women's subjectivity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Crenshaw and some other feminist theorists continue to center intersectionality theory on the identity category of Black women and their experiences of intersecting racism and sexism.
“Although Crenshaw and some other feminist theorists continue to center intersectionality theory on the identity category of Black women and their experiences of intersecting racism and sexism (Alexander-Floyd, 2012:11;May, 2014:24;McCall, 2005McCall, :1774;;Nash, 2014b:46), some theorists have re-framed intersectionality as a theory of the complexity of intersecting identities and power dynamics (”
From Introduction to Archaeologies Special Issue on Intersectionality Theory and Research in Historical Archaeology (2022) · cites this paper as Alexander-Floyd, 2012
Citations
Cites
Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color
Crenshaw, K. (1991) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229039 · Cited by 32,792
Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.
Brewer, R. M., & Collins, P. H. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074808 · Cited by 19,445
Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestiza
Anzaldúa, G. (2017) · Censored · doi:10.1515/9780773551886-027 · Cited by 10,736
Crenshaw, K. (2018) · Feminist Legal Theory · doi:10.4324/9780429500480-5 · Cited by 9,510
The Complexity of Intersectionality
McCall, L. (2005) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/426800 · Cited by 6,682 · cited 1×
“First, although I focus my analysis on the work of Leslie McCall (”
BackgroundNash, J. C. (2008) · Feminist Review · doi:10.1057/fr.2008.4 · Cited by 1,995
Beal, F. M. (2008) · Meridians · doi:10.2979/mer.2008.8.2.166 · Cited by 511
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies: Theory, Applications, and Praxis
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013) · Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society · doi:10.1086/669608 · Cited by 4,126
Intersectionality's Definitional Dilemmas
Collins, P. H. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142 · Cited by 2,419
Un/Doing Intersectionality through Higher Education Research
Harris, J. C., & Patton, L. D. (2019) · The Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/00221546.2018.1536936 · Cited by 308
Tormos, F. (2017) · Politics, Groups, and Identities · doi:10.1080/21565503.2017.1385494 · Cited by 119
Spencer-Wood, S. M., & Trunzo, J. M. C. (2022) · Archaeologies · doi:10.1007/s11759-022-09442-5 · Cited by 18
Calow, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Sports and Active Living · doi:10.3389/fspor.2022.920806 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander-Floyd, N. G.
- Venue
- Feminist Formations
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-25
- ISSN
- 2151-7371
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 7
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review