The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
E-learning in Postsecondary Education
Open accessAbstract
Over the past decade postsecondary education has been moving increasingly from the classroom to online. During the fall 2010 term 31 percent of U.S. college students took at least one online course. The primary reasons for the growth of e-learning in the nation’s colleges and universities include the desire of those institutions to generate new revenue streams, improve access, and offer students greater scheduling flexibility. Yet the growth of e-learning has been accompanied by a continuing debate about its effectiveness and by the recognition that a number of barriers impede its widespread adoption in higher education. Through an extensive research review, Bradford Bell and Jessica Federman examine three key issues in the growing use of e-learning in postsecondary education. The first is whether e-learning is as effective as other delivery methods. The debate about the effectiveness of e-learning, the authors say, has been framed in terms of how it compares with other means of delivering instruction, most often traditional instructor-led classroom instruction. Bell and Federman review a number of meta-analyses and other studies that, taken together, show that e-learning produces outcomes equivalent to other delivery media when instructional conditions are held constant. The second issue is what particular features of e-learning influence its effectiveness. Here the authors move beyond the “does it work” question to examine how different instructional features and supports, such as immersion and interactivity, influence the effectiveness of e-learning programs. They review research that shows how these features can be configured to create e-learning programs that help different types of learners acquire different types of knowledge. In addressing the third issue—the barriers to the adoption of e-learning in postsecondary education—Bell and Federman discuss how concerns about fraud and cheating, uncertainties about the cost of e-learning, and the unique challenges faced by low-income and disadvantaged students have the potential to undermine the adoption of e-learning instruction. Based on their research review, the authors conclude that e-learning can be an effective means of delivering postsecondary education. They also urge researchers to examine how different aspects of these programs influence their effectiveness and to address the numerous barriers to the adoption of online instruction in higher education.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media
Clark, R. E. (1983) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543053004445 · Cited by 2,715
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.48.12.1181 · Cited by 2,033
Media will never influence learning
Clark, R. E. (1994) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299088 · Cited by 1,893
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., Wallet, P. A., Fiset, M., & Huang, B. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074003379 · Cited by 1,761
Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features.
Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234 · Cited by 1,252
A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654309333844 · Cited by 1,171
Individual and Contextual Influences on Academic Dishonesty: A Multicampus Investigation
McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1997) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1024954224675 · Cited by 830
Jaggars, S., & Bailey, T. R. (2010) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d85m63sm · Cited by 222
Cited by
Online Education and Its Effective Practice: A Research Review
Sun, A., & Chen, X. (2016) · Journal of Information Technology Education: Research · doi:10.28945/3502 · Cited by 908
Castro, M. D. B., & Tumibay, G. M. (2021) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-019-10027-z · Cited by 517
Online Education: Benefits, Challenges and Strategies During and After COVID-19 in Higher Education
Paudel, P. (2020) · International Journal on Studies in Education · doi:10.46328/ijonse.32 · Cited by 508
100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go.
Bell, B. S., Tannenbaum, S. I., Ford, J. K., Noe, R. A., & Kraiger, K. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000142 · Cited by 462
Self-citationTracking e-learning through published papers: A systematic review
Rodrigues, H., Almeida, F., Figueiredo, V., & Lopes, S. L. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.007 · Cited by 399
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, B. S., & Federman, J. E.
- Venue
- The Future of Children
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-185
- ISSN
- 1054-8289 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-1558
- OpenAlex
- W2016335841
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 95.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: E-learning in Postsecondary Education. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/foc.2013.0007
- The paper
- Bell, B. S., & Federman, J. E. (2013). E-learning in Postsecondary Education. The Future of Children. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2013.0007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.