Cited by 182Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequalitySocial and Cultural Dynamics

Long-Term Intergenerational Persistence of Human Capital: An Empirical Analysis of Four Generations

Lindahl, Mikael, Palme, Mårten, Massih, Sofia Sandgren, Sjögren, Anna·2015·Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

Most previous studies of intergenerational transmission of human capital are restricted to two generations – parents and their children. In this study we use a Swedish data set which enables us link individual measures of lifetime earnings for three generations and data on educational attainments of four generations. We investigate to what extent estimates based on income data from two generations accurately predict earnings persistence beyond two generations. We also do a similar analysis for intergenerational persistence in educational attainments. We find two-generation studies to severely under-predict intergenerational persistence in earnings and educational attainment over three and four generations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jhr.2015.0000

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.

    “The second finding is that educational inequality is surprisingly persistent across multiple generations.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Lindahl et al. 2015

  • Recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families persist over many generations.

    “Yet, recent empirical evidence shows that differences in economic status across families instead persist over many generations (e.g., Clark 2014, Lindahl et al. 2015).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Lindahl et al. 2015

  • Educational outcomes of ancestors remain predictive of child education, even after conditioning on parent education.

    “One way to demonstrate this point is to note that educational outcomes of ancestors remain predictive of child education, even after conditioning on parent education (e.g., Lindahl et al. 2015, Braun and Stuhler 2018, Colagrossi, d'Hombres, and Schnepf 2020).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Lindahl et al. 2015

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindahl, M., Palme, M., Massih, S. S., & Sjögren, A.
Affiliations
Uppsala University (SE)
Venue
Journal of Human Resources
Published
2015
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
1-33
ISSN
  • 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8004
OpenAlex
W2007121861
Cited by
182
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
57.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Cultural Dynamics
Keywords
intergenerational persistence, human capital, earnings persistence, educational attainment, intergenerational transmission, lifetime earnings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review