Cited by 12Digital Platforms and EconomicsDiverse Legal and Medical StudiesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

The Future of Platform Power: Fixing The Business Model

Maréchal, Nathalie·2021·Journal of Democracy

Abstract

Digital platform companies whose business models hinge on the monetization of personal information, notably through targeted advertising, have run roughshod over competitors, communities, and democracy itself in the single-minded pursuit of market dominance and ever-increasing profits. An expert consensus that this business model is responsible for these platforms' negative externalities has emerged in recent years, yet the nature of the targeted-advertising business model is often poorly understood. It rests on three theoretical pillars: surveillance capitalism, Chicago School neoliberalism, and "technosolutionism." The "middleware" proposal merely displaces the perverse incentives inherent to the business model. However, policy interventions focused on reforming online advertising, notably through comprehensive privacy reform, are much more promising.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/jod.2021.0041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Encouraging customized social media experiences is unlikely to address social fragmentation and ideological polarization, given that it does not change the underlying ad-driven business model.

    “Furthermore, encouraging customized social media experiences is unlikely to address social fragmentation and ideological polarization (Faris & Donovan, 2021), given that it does not change the underlying ad-driven business model (Maréchal, 2021).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maréchal, N.
Corresponding author
Maréchal, Nathalie
Venue
Journal of Democracy
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2021
Volume
32
Issue
3
Pages
157-162
ISSN
  • 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
  • 1086-3214
OpenAlex
W3188579354
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
digital platforms, business models, targeted advertising, surveillance capitalism, techno-solutionism, platform power, market dominance, negative externalities, data monetization, democracy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review