The Future of Platform Power: Fixing The Business Model
Abstract
Digital platform companies whose business models hinge on the monetization of personal information, notably through targeted advertising, have run roughshod over competitors, communities, and democracy itself in the single-minded pursuit of market dominance and ever-increasing profits. An expert consensus that this business model is responsible for these platforms' negative externalities has emerged in recent years, yet the nature of the targeted-advertising business model is often poorly understood. It rests on three theoretical pillars: surveillance capitalism, Chicago School neoliberalism, and "technosolutionism." The "middleware" proposal merely displaces the perverse incentives inherent to the business model. However, policy interventions focused on reforming online advertising, notably through comprehensive privacy reform, are much more promising.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Encouraging customized social media experiences is unlikely to address social fragmentation and ideological polarization, given that it does not change the underlying ad-driven business model.
“Furthermore, encouraging customized social media experiences is unlikely to address social fragmentation and ideological polarization (Faris & Donovan, 2021), given that it does not change the underlying ad-driven business model (Maréchal, 2021).”
From Stuck in the middleware with you: the challenges of capitalizing a market-oriented approach to platform governance (2025) · cites this paper as Maréchal, 2021
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Decentralized social networks and the future of free speech online
Huang, T. (2024) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106059 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Hallinan, B., Rothenstein, O., & John, N. A. (2025) · Communication and Change · doi:10.1007/s44382-025-00018-9
“Furthermore, encouraging customized social media experiences is unlikely to address social fragmentation and ideological polarization (Faris & Donovan, 2021), given that it does not change the underlying ad-driven business model (Maréchal, 2021).”
- Authors
- Maréchal, N.
- Corresponding author
- Maréchal, Nathalie
- Venue
- Journal of Democracy
- Publisher
- Project MUSE
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 157-162
- ISSN
- 1045-5736 (ISSN-L)
- 1086-3214
- OpenAlex
- W3188579354
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of democracy (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Keywords
- digital platforms, business models, targeted advertising, surveillance capitalism, techno-solutionism, platform power, market dominance, negative externalities, data monetization, democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review