The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structure and Intonation
Open accessAbstract
Rules for assigning phrasal intonation to sentences are often assumed to require an autonomous level of intonational structure', distinct from what is usually thought of as surface syntactic structure. The present paper argues that the requisite notion of structure can be subsumed under the generalized notion of surface structure that emerges from the combinatory extension of Categorial Grammar. According to this theory, the syntactic structures and the intonational structures of English are one, and can be captured in a single unified grammar. The interpretations that the grammar provides for such constituents correspond to the entities and open propositions that are concerned in certain discourse-related aspects of intonational meaning that have variously been described as ‘theme’ and ‘rheme’ ‘given’ and ‘new’, and ‘presupposition’ and ‘focus’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315836010 · Cited by 6,082
Chomsky, N., & Halle, M. (1968) · Cited by 5,162
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,003
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar
Freidin, R., & Jackendoff, R. S. (1975) · Language · doi:10.2307/413161 · Cited by 4,615
Understanding natural language
Winograd, T. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90002-3 · Cited by 2,799
Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0022226700016613 · Cited by 2,090
Intonational structure in Japanese and English
Beckman, M. E., & Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1986) · Phonology Yearbook · doi:10.1017/s095267570000066x · Cited by 1,802
The Meaning of Intonational Contours in the Interpretation of Discourse
Pierrehumbert, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1990) · Intentions in Communication · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3839.003.0016 · Cited by 1,433
The Mathematics of Sentence Structure
Lambek, J. (1958) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.1080/00029890.1958.11989160 · Cited by 1,273
Cited by
Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (2019) · The Oxford Handbook of Reference · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.5 · Cited by 1,645
A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1007/bf01708572 · Cited by 734
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Combinatory Categorial Grammar
Steedman, M., & Baldridge, J. (2011) · Non‐Transformational Syntax · doi:10.1002/9781444395037.ch5 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Steedman, M. J.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- Linguistic Society of America
- Published
- 1991-06-01
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-296
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983440413
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 40
- FWCI
- 94.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure and Intonation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1353/lan.1991.0098
- The paper
- Steedman, M. J. (1991). Structure and Intonation. Language. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1991.0098
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.