The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Can Cultural Worldviews Influence Network Composition?
Abstract
Most sociological research assumes that social network composition shapes individual beliefs. Network theory and research has not adequately considered that internalized cultural worldviews might affect network composition. Drawing on a synthetic, dual-process theory of culture and two waves of nationally-representative panel data, this article shows that worldviews are strong predictors of changes in network composition among U.S. youth. These effects are robust to the influence of other structural factors, including prior network composition and behavioral homophily. By contrast, there is little evidence that networks play a strong proximate role in shaping worldviews. This suggests that internalized cultural dispositions play an important role in shaping the interpersonal environment and that the dynamic link between culture and social structure needs to be reconsidered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste*
Bourdieu, P. (2018) · Food and Culture · doi:10.4324/9781315680347-10 · Cited by 20,289
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Bourdieu, P. (1990) · doi:10.1515/9781503621749 · Cited by 17,271
The Interpretation of Cultures
(2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912128310 · Cited by 16,449
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · cited 2×
“The cognitive and behavioral sciences recognize two analytically distinct levels of mental functioning – the conscious and the automatic (Nisbett and Wilson 1977; Shiffrin and Schneider 1977; Sloman 1996; Chaiken and Trope 1999; Smith and DeCoster 2000; Evans 2008).”
BackgroundCulture in Action: Symbols and Strategies
Swidler, A. (1986) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2095521 · Cited by 8,661
The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment.
Haidt, J. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.4.814 · Cited by 8,048
Shiffrin, R. M., & Schneider, W. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.127 · Cited by 7,335
Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables.
MTW, & Long, J. S. (1997) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2965458 · Cited by 6,898
(1999) · Cited by 6,104
Cited by
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. B. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804840115 · Cited by 1,863
Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2010) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2009.11.003 · Cited by 391
Self-citationPatterson, O. (2014) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043123 · Cited by 399
What You Can—and Can’t—Do With Three-Wave Panel Data
Vaisey, S., & Miles, A. (2017) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124114547769 · Cited by 299
Self-citationWhat are dual process models? implications for cultural analysis in sociology.
Lizardo, O., Mowry, R., Sepulvado, B., Stoltz, D. S., Taylor, M. A., Van Ness, J., & Wood, M. (2016) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275116675900 · Cited by 245
Self-citationPluralistic Collapse: The “Oil Spill” Model of Mass Opinion Polarization
DellaPosta, D. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420922989 · Cited by 250
Cultural Schemas: What They Are, How to Find Them, and What to Do Once You’ve Caught One
Boutyline, A., & Soter, L. K. (2021) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224211024525 · Cited by 216
Cheadle, J. E., & Schwadel, P. (2012) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.03.014 · Cited by 149
Interviews and inference: making sense of interview data in qualitative research
Tavory, I. (2020) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/s11133-020-09464-x · Cited by 133
Mueller, A. S., & Abrutyn, S. (2016) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122416663464 · Cited by 132
A Hunger for God: Embodied Metaphor as Cultural Cognition in Action
Winchester, D. (2016) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sow065 · Cited by 117
Community Sense: The Cohesive Power of Aesthetic Judgment
Wohl, H. (2015) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/0735275115617800 · Cited by 78
Wang, B., He, P., & Dong, B. (2015) · Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics · doi:10.1016/j.archger.2015.01.002 · Cited by 59
When Too Much Integration and Regulation Hurts: Reenvisioning Durkheim’s Altruistic Suicide
Abrutyn, S., & Mueller, A. S. (2016) · Society and Mental Health · doi:10.1177/2156869315604346 · Cited by 58
Norton, M. (2020) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-019-00075-w · Cited by 20
Hawdon, J., Ranganathan, S., Leman, S., Bookhultz, S., & Mitra, T. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_17 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Vaisey, S., & Lizardo, O.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-06-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1595-1618
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- 1534-7605
- OpenAlex
- W2098789281
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 82
- FWCI
- 37.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
