Cited by 140School Choice and PerformanceDiverse Education Studies and ReformsReligious Education and Schools

Further Evidence on the Effects of Catholic Secondary Schooling

Grogger, Jeff, Neal, Derek A·2000·Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs

Abstract

Education reform is a perennial topic of debate for both policymakers and social scientists. While most education research and related reform proposals deal with strategies for evaluating and improving current systems of financing and delivering public education, some research and a growing number of public and private initiatives focus on privately provided education and its value as an alternative to public schooling.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/urb.2000.0006

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grogger, J., & Neal, D. A.
Venue
Brookings-Wharton Papers on Urban Affairs
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2000
Volume
2000
Issue
1
Pages
151-193
ISSN
  • 1528-7084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4449
OpenAlex
W1980727296
Cited by
140
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
35.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Education › Religious Education and Schools
Keywords
Catholic schools, private education, secondary education, educational reform, returns to education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review