The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population-Based Sample: The OPUS Study
Open accessAbstract
We compared the performance of five QUS devices with DXA in a population-based sample of 2837 women. All QUS approaches discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS of the calcaneus performed as well as central DXA. Introduction: Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods have found widespread use for the assessment of bone status in osteoporosis, but their optimal use remains to be established. To determine QUS performance for current devices in direct comparison with central DXA, we initiated a large population-based investigation, the Osteoporosis and Ultrasound Study (OPUS). Materials and Methods: A total of 463 women 20–39 years of age and 2374 women 55–79 years of age were measured on five different QUS devices along with DXA of the spine and the proximal femur. Their vertebral fracture status was evaluated radiographically. The association of QUS and DXA with vertebral fracture status was evaluated using logistic regression. Results: All QUS approaches tested discriminated women with and without osteoporotic vertebral fractures (20% height reduction), with age-adjusted standardized odds ratios ranging 1.2–1.3 for amplitude-dependent speed of sound (AD-SOS) at the finger phalanges, 1.2–1.4 for broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) at the calcaneus, and 1.4–1.5 for speed of sound (SOS) at the calcaneus, 1.4–1.6 for DXA of the total femur, and 1.5–1.6 for DXA at the spine. For more severe fractures (40% height reduction), age-adjusted standardized odds ratios increased to up to 1.9 for DXA of the spine and 2.3 for SOS of the calcaneus. Conclusions: In conclusion, all five QUS devices tested showed significant age-adjusted differences between subjects with and without vertebral fracture. When selecting the strongest variable, QUS of the calcaneus worked as well as central DXA for identification of women at high risk for prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures. QUS-based case-finding strategies would allow halving the number of radiographs in high-risk populations, and this strategy works increasingly well for women with more severe vertebral fractures. It is likely that the good performance of QUS was in part achieved by rigorous quality assurance measures that should also be used in clinical practice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures
Cummings, S. R., Browner, W., Cummings, S. R., Black, D. M., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W., Genant, H. K., Cauley, J., Ensrud, K., Scott, J., et al. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92555-8 · Cited by 2,446
Pre-Existing Fractures and Bone Mass Predict Vertebral Fracture Incidence in Women
Ross, P. D., Davis, J. W., Epstein, R. S., & Wasnich, R. D. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-11-919 · Cited by 1,107
Kalender, W. A., Felsenberg, D., Genant, H. K., Fischer, M., Dequeker, J., & Reeve, J. (1995) · European Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1016/0720-048x(95)00631-y · Cited by 263
Self-citation
Cited by
A meta-analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women
Johansson, H., Kanis, J. A., Odén, A., McCloskey, E., Chapurlat, R. D., Christiansen, C., Cummings, S. R., Diez-Perez, A., Eisman, J. A., Fujiwara, S., et al. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1002/jbmr.2017 · Cited by 480
Self-citationQuantitative ultrasound of the heel and fracture risk assessment: An updated meta-analysis
Moayyeri, A., Adams, J. E., Adler, R. A., Krieg, M.-A., Hans, D., Compston, J., & Lewiecki, E. M. (2012) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1817-5 · Cited by 266
Kim, S. K. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200785 · Cited by 185
Murphy, E., Glüer, C. C., Reid, D. M., Felsenberg, D., Roux, C., Eastell, R., & Williams, G. R. (2010) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2009-2630 · Cited by 180
Self-citationDiagnostic tests: Bone mineral density: Testing for osteoporosis
Sheu, A., & Diamond, T. (2016) · Australian Prescriber · doi:10.18773/austprescr.2016.020 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Dr Glüer, C. C., Eastell, R., Reid, D. M., Felsenberg, D., Roux, C., Barkmann, R., Timm, W., Blenk, T., Armbrecht, G., Stewart, A., Clowes, J., Thomasius, F. E., & Kolta, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-05-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 782-793
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2095569436
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 21.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population-Based Sample: The OPUS Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.040304
- The paper
- Dr Glüer, C. C., Eastell, R., Reid, D. M., Felsenberg, D., Roux, C., Barkmann, R., Timm, W., Blenk, T., Armbrecht, G., Stewart, A., Clowes, J., Thomasius, F. E., & Kolta, S. (2004). Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population-Based Sample: The OPUS Study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.040304
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.