Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 293

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elimination and Biochemical Responses to Intravenous Alendronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

Open access
Khan, Sohail A., Kanis, John A., Vasikaran, Samuel, Kline, W. F., Matuszewski, B. K., McCloskey, Eugene V., Beneton, Monique N. C., Gertz, Barry J., Sciberras, David G., Holland, S. D., Orgee, Jane, Coombes, Gillian M., Rogers, Suzanne R., Porras, A. G.·1997·Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Abstract

Postmenopausal women with established vertebral osteoporosis were studied for 2 years to determine the terminal elimination half-life and the duration of response to treatment with intravenous alendronate (30 mg) given over 4 days. The urinary excretion of alendronate followed a multiexponential decline. Approximately 50% of the total dose was excreted over the first 5 days, and a further 17% was excreted in the succeeding 6 months. Thereafter, there was a much slower elimination phase with an estimated mean terminal half-life of greater than 10 years (n = 11). Urinary excretion of hydroxyproline and calcium decreased significantly from pretreatment values by day 3, reaching a nadir by 1 week (40% and 67% decrease, respectively). Thereafter, hydroxyproline remained suppressed for the following 2 years. In contrast, urinary calcium excretion returned gradually toward pretreatment values over the first year and during the second year was comparable to pretreatment values. Serum activity of alkaline phosphatase activity decreased over 3 months (23% reduction), increased gradually thereafter, and returned to pretreatment values at month 24. Bone mineral density measured at the spine increased by approximately 5% during the first year and remained significantly higher than pretreatment values at 2 years. We conclude that a short course of high doses of intravenous alendronate is associated with a prolonged skeletal retention of the agent. This open study also suggests that this regimen has a sustained effect on bone turnover persisting for at least 1 year.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1700

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 293

Metadata

Authors
Khan, S. A., Kanis, J. A., Vasikaran, S., Kline, W. F., Matuszewski, B. K., McCloskey, E. V., Beneton, M. N. C., Gertz, B. J., Sciberras, D. G., Holland, S. D., Orgee, J., Coombes, G. M., Rogers, S. R., & Porras, A. G.
Venue
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Published
1997-10-01
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
1700-1707
ISSN
  • 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-4681
OpenAlex
W2072797307
Cited by
293
References
1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Elimination and Biochemical Responses to Intravenous Alendronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1700
The paper
Khan, S. A., Kanis, J. A., Vasikaran, S., Kline, W. F., Matuszewski, B. K., McCloskey, E. V., Beneton, M. N. C., Gertz, B. J., Sciberras, D. G., Holland, S. D., Orgee, J., Coombes, G. M., Rogers, S. R., & Porras, A. G. (1997). Elimination and Biochemical Responses to Intravenous Alendronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.10.1700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.