The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low‐Magnitude Mechanical Loading Becomes Osteogenic When Rest Is Inserted Between Each Load Cycle
Open accessAbstract
Strategies to counteract bone loss with exercise have had fairly limited success, particularly those regimens subjecting the skeleton to mild activity such as walking. In contrast, here we show that it is possible to induce substantial bone formation with low‐magnitude loading. In two distinct in vivo models of bone adaptation, we found that insertion of a 10‐s rest interval between each load cycle transformed a locomotion‐like loading regime that minimally influenced osteoblast activity into a potent anabolic stimulus. In the avian ulna model, the minimal mean (+SE) periosteal labeled surface (Ps.LS) observed in the intact contralateral bones (1.6 ± 1.5%) was doubled after 3 consecutive days of low‐magnitude loading (3.8 ± 1.5%; p = 0.03). However, modifying the regimen by inserting 10 s of rest between each load cycle significantly enhanced the periosteal response (21.9 + 4.5%; p = 0.03). In the murine tibia model, 5 consecutive days of 100 low‐magnitude loading cycles did not significantly alter mean periosteal bone formation rate (BFR) compared with contralateral bones (0.011 ± 0.005 μm 3/μm 2 per day vs. 0.021 ± 0.013 μm 3/μm 2 per day). In contrast, separating each of 10 of the same loading cycles with 10 s of rest significantly elevated periosteal BFR (0.167 ± 0.049 μm 3/μm 2 per day; p = 0.01). Endocortical bone formation parameters were not altered by any loading regimen in either model. We conclude that 10 s of rest between each load cycle of a low‐magnitude loading protocol greatly enhances the osteogenic potential of the regimen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kleinnulend, J., Semeins, C. M., Ajubi, N. E., Nijweide, P. J., & Burger, E. H. (1995) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.1995.2822 · Cited by 425
Cited by
BIOMECHANICAL AND MOLECULAR REGULATION OF BONE REMODELING
Robling, A. G., Castillo, A. B., & Turner, C. H. (2006) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.8.061505.095721 · Cited by 1,343
Mechanical signals as anabolic agents in bone
Ozcivici, E., Luu, Y. K., Adler, B., Qin, Y.-X., Rubin, J., Judex, S., & Rubin, C. T. (2010) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2009.239 · Cited by 441
Barbe, M. F., Gallagher, S., Massicotte, V. S., Tytell, M., Popoff, S. N., & Barr-Gillespie, A. E. (2013) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-303 · Cited by 135
Maggiano, C. M., Maggiano, I. S., Tiesler, V. G., Chi‐Keb, J. R., & Stout, S. D. (2016) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12383 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Srinivasan, S., Weimer, D. A., Agans, S. C., Bain, S. D., & Gross, T. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1613-1620
- ISSN
- 0884-0431 (ISSN-L)
- 1523-4681
- OpenAlex
- W2036338634
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐Magnitude Mechanical Loading Becomes Osteogenic When Rest Is Inserted Between Each Load Cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1613
- The paper
- Srinivasan, S., Weimer, D. A., Agans, S. C., Bain, S. D., & Gross, T. S. (2002). Low‐Magnitude Mechanical Loading Becomes Osteogenic When Rest Is Inserted Between Each Load Cycle. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.9.1613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.