Cited by 76Environmental Sustainability in BusinessConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationEnvironmental Education and Sustainability

The Effectiveness of Environmental Claims among Chinese Consumers: Influences of Claim Type, Country Disposition and Ecocentric Orientation

Chan, Ricky Y. K., Lau, Lorett B. Y.·2004·Journal of Marketing Management

Abstract

This study empirically examines how environmental claim type affects the communication effectiveness of environmental advertising claims among Chinese consumers, and how two individual difference variables—country disposition and ecocentric orientation—moderate the claim type-effectiveness relationship. The present findings reveal that environmental claim type, country disposition, and ecocentric orientation all exert significant influences on communication effectiveness. Specifically, it is shown that substantive environmental claims generate greater communication effectiveness than associative environmental claims for both high-involvement and low-involvement purchases. For both types of purchases, environmental claims also generate more positive responses from consumers exhibiting a strong ecocentric orientation than from those exhibiting a weak ecocentric orientation. In addition, when compared with those holding a negative country disposition toward the source country, consumers holding a positive country disposition express more favorable responses toward environmental claims in high-involvement purchases. Finally, the present study also reveals that country disposition and ecocentric orientation jointly exert significant moderating effects on the claim type-effectiveness relationship in high-involvement purchases. These results remind marketers of the importance of adopting a situational perspective by taking country disposition and ecocentric orientation into account when determining which types of environmental claims should be employed to appeal to their targeted Chinese consumers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1362/026725704323080425

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The specific-vague dichotomy is conceptually distinct from the substantive-associative dichotomy.

    “Similarly, the specific-vague dichotomy is conceptually distinct from the substantiveassociative dichotomy (Chan, 2000; Chan and Lau, 2004).”

    From How Claim Specificity Can Improve Claim Credibility in Green Advertising (2018) · cites this paper as Chan and Lau, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, R. Y. K., & Lau, L. B. Y.
Venue
Journal of Marketing Management
Published
2004-04
Volume
20
Issue
3-4
Pages
273-319
ISSN
  • 0267-257X (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1376
OpenAlex
W2027308636
Cited by
76
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marketing Management (publishedVersion)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
Keywords
environmental claims, communication effectiveness, high-involvement purchases, Chinese consumers, situational approach, green marketing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review