The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences
Abstract
The main obstacle in retrieving quantitative phase with high sensitivity is posed by the phase noise due to mechanical vibrations and air fluctuations that typically affect any interferometric system. In this paper, we review diffraction phase microscopy (DPM), which is a common-path quantitative phase imaging (QPI) method that significantly alleviates the noise problem. DPM utilizes a compact Mach–Zehnder interferometer to combine several attributes of current QPI methods. This compact configuration inherently cancels out most mechanisms responsible for noise and is single-shot, meaning that the acquisition speed is limited only by the speed of the camera employed. This technique is also nondestructive and does not require staining or coating of the specimen. This unique collection of features enables the DPM system to accurately monitor the dynamics of various nanoscale phenomena in a wide variety of environments. The DPM system can operate in both transmission and reflection modes in order to accommodate both transparent and opaque samples, respectively. Thus, current applications of DPM include measuring the dynamics of biological samples, semiconductor wet etching and photochemical etching processes, surface wetting and evaporation of water droplets, self-assembly of nanotubes, expansion and deformation of materials, and semiconductor wafer defect detection. Finally, DPM with white light averages out much of the speckle background and also offers potential for spectroscopic measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Габор, Д. (1946) · Journal of the IEE · Cited by 5,036
GABOR, D. (1948) · Nature · doi:10.1038/161777a0 · Cited by 4,548
Fourier-transform method of fringe-pattern analysis for computer-based topography and interferometry
Takeda, M., Ina, H., & Kobayashi, S. (1982) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.72.000156 · Cited by 4,277
Beiträge zur Theorie des Mikroskops und der mikroskopischen Wahrnehmung
Abbe, E. (1873) · Archiv für Mikroskopische Anatomie · doi:10.1007/bf02956173 · Cited by 2,724
Phase-shifting digital holography
Yamaguchi, I., & Zhang, T. (1997) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.22.001268 · Cited by 2,061
Hoshen, J., & Kopelman, R. (1976) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.14.3438 · Cited by 1,928
The pathogenic basis of malaria
Miller, L. H., Baruch, D. I., Marsh, K., & Doumbo, O. K. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415673a · Cited by 1,746
Developing optofluidic technology through the fusion of microfluidics and optics
Psaltis, D., Quake, S. R., & Yang, C. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05060 · Cited by 1,733
Reconstructed Wavefronts and Communication Theory*
Leith, E. N., & Upatnieks, J. (1962) · Journal of the Optical Society of America · doi:10.1364/josa.52.001123 · Cited by 1,658
Marquet, P., Rappaz, B., Magistretti, P. J., Cuche, E., Emery, Y., Colomb, T., & Depeursinge, C. (2005) · Optics Letters · doi:10.1364/ol.30.000468 · Cited by 1,254
Cited by
Gradient light interference microscopy for 3D imaging of unlabeled specimens
Nguyen, T. H., Kandel, M. E., Rubessa, M., Wheeler, M. B., & Popescu, G. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00190-7 · Cited by 259
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bhaduri, B., Edwards, C., Pham, H., Zhou, R., Nguyen, T. H., Goddard, L. L., & Popescu, G.
- Venue
- Advances in Optics and Photonics
- Publisher
- Optica Publishing Group
- Published
- 2014-03-26
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 57
- ISSN
- 1943-8206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004908285
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1364/aop.6.000057
- The paper
- Bhaduri, B., Edwards, C., Pham, H., Zhou, R., Nguyen, T. H., Goddard, L. L., & Popescu, G. (2014). Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences. Advances in Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1364/aop.6.000057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.