Cited by 79Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural dynamics and brain function

Human contrast discrimination and the threshold of cortical neurons

Barlow, H. B., Hawken, M., Parker, A. J., Kaushal, T. P.·1987·Journal of the Optical Society of America A

Abstract

The human contrast-discrimination function has a curious shape: In addition to rising for increasing contrasts, both positive and negative, it also rises for very low contrasts on either side of zero. It is shown that this rise near zero contrast is not much affected by procedures that increase or decrease the subject's knowledge of the stimulus; this counts against uncertainty as the immediate cause of the elevation near zero contrast. The alternative explanation in terms of a genuine response threshold is shown to be promising when measurements of human contrast discrimination are compared with values calculated from records of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex. The comparison also suggests that the dynamic range of single neurons is lower than that shown psychophysically. It is suggested that having a cortical threshold may be the visual system's way of preventing false positives when there is much stimulus uncertainty. This threshold may also help to explain why quantum efficiencies calculated from detection thresholds are so poor compared with those estimated from the visual system's susceptibility to added noise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/josaa.4.002366

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have found good agreement between population-level responses of gain-modulated neurons and psychophysical performance in visual contrast discrimination in humans and non-human primates.

    “Indeed, several studies have found good agreement between the population-level responses of gain-modulated neurons (such as the population-average contrast response function) and psychophysical performance (for example, in visual contrast discrimination) in humans and non-human primates12,20–24.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [20]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barlow, H. B., Hawken, M., Parker, A. J., & Kaushal, T. P.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Journal of the Optical Society of America A
Published
1987-12-01
Volume
4
Issue
12
Pages
2366
ISSN
  • 1084-7529 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-8532
OpenAlex
W1992430091
Cited by
79
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Optical Society of America A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
contrast discrimination, response threshold, cortical neurons, primary visual cortex, dynamic range, stimulus uncertainty, false positives, quantum efficiency, detection threshold
MeSH terms
Humans, Neurons, Psychophysics, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review