CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multidimensional quantum information based on single-photon temporal wavepackets

Hayat, Alex, Xing, Xingxing, Feizpour, Amir, Steinberg, Aephraim M.·2012·Optics Express
DOI 10.1364/oe.20.029174
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1364/oe.20.029174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Probabilistic single-photon sources include parametric down-conversion in bulk crystals, semiconductors, microresonators and optical waveguides, and four-wave mixing in optical waveguides, few-mode fibers and microdisks.

    “Among probabilistic sources we mention (a) parametric down-conversion (PDC) in bulk crystals [204], semiconductors [166,215], microresonators [183, 185] and optical waveguides [32, 172-175, 177-182, 209, 210, 212-214] and (b) four-wave mixing (FWM) in optical waveguides [184,189,211], few-mode fibers [186] and microdisks [187].”

    From Photonic quantum information processing: a review (2019) · cites this paper as [166]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies cavity parametric down-conversion as a way to obtain single-photon states, supporting the PDC portion of the claim. The paper does not substantiate the listed range of source platforms or the four-wave-mixing examples; it focuses on temporal encoding of PDC-generated photons. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Barreiro, 2008, Nat. Phys., 4, 282, 10.1038/nphys919 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Barreiro, 2005, Phys. Rev. Lett., 95, 260501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.260501 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Vértesi, 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett., 104, 060401, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.060401 · DOI
  4. Rarity, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 64, 2495, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2495 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Franson, 1989, Phys. Rev. Lett., 62, 2205, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.2205 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Ou, 1990, Phys. Rev. Lett., 65, 321, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.321 · DOI
  7. Kwiat, 1990, Phys. Rev. A, 41, 2910, 10.1103/PhysRevA.41.2910 · DOI
  8. Mair, 2001, Nature, 412, 313, 10.1038/35085529 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Molina-Terriza, 2007, Nat. Phys., 3, 305, 10.1038/nphys607 · DOI
  10. Dada, 2011, Nat. Phys., 7, 677, 10.1038/nphys1996 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Brendel, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 2594, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2594 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Thew, 2004, Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 010503, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.010503 · DOI
  13. Kuzucu, 2008, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101, 153602, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.153602 · DOI
  14. Eckstein, 2011, Opt. Express, 19, 13770, 10.1364/OE.19.013770 · DOI
  15. Brecht, 2011, New J. Phys., 13, 065029, 10.1088/1367-2630/13/6/065029 · DOI
  16. Polycarpou, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 053602, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.053602 · DOI
  17. Ou, 1999, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83, 2556, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.2556 · DOI
  18. Kuklewicz, 2006, Phys. Rev. Lett., 97, 223601, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.223601 · DOI
  19. Wolfgramm, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 18145, 10.1364/OE.16.018145 · DOI
  20. Kielpinski, 2011, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106, 130501, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.130501 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Park, 2008, Opt. Express, 16, 17817, 10.1364/OE.16.017817 · DOI
  22. Walsh, 1923, Am. J. Math., 45, 5, 10.2307/2387224 · DOI
  23. Thew, 2002, Phys. Rev. A, 66, 012303, 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.012303 · DOI
  24. Law, 2000, Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 5304, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.5304 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hayat, A., Xing, X., Feizpour, A., & Steinberg, A. M.
Venue
Optics Express
Publisher
Optica Publishing Group
Published
2012-12-17
Volume
20
Issue
28
Pages
29174
ISSN
1094-4087
DOI
10.1364/oe.20.029174
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review